Table 4. General evaluation of the eAEP by the intervention group (n=41).
| Strongly agree n (%) | Tend to agree n (%) | Neither agree nor disagree n (%) | Tend to disagree n (%) | Completely disagree n (%) | No answer n (%) | |
| The web presence is visually appealing | 21 (51) | 16 (39) | 2 (5) | 1 (2) | 0 | 1 (2) |
| The contents are exactly adapted to my learning progress | 20 (49) | 14 (34) | 6 (15) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2) |
| The font size is exactly right | 22 (54) | 16 (39) | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 | 1 (2) |
| The linguistic level of the website is exactly right | 28 (68) | 11 (27) | 1 (2) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2) |
| I would recommend the eAEP | 28 (68) | 11 (27) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2) | 1 (2) |
| I learned a lot about asthma from the eAEP | 23 (56) | 10 (24) | 5 (12) | 1 (2) | 0 | 2 (5) |
| I would rather use the eAEP than the pAEP | 4 (10) | 5 (12) | 20 (49) | 9 (22) | 1 (2) | 2 (5) |
eAEP, electronic asthma education program; pAEP, presence-based asthma education program