Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 25;120(4):1998–2010. doi: 10.1152/jn.00292.2018

Table 2.

Surveys and physiological measures during training

Measure VR with Perturbations VR without Perturbations Unaltered View
Motion Sickness 24.3% (17.3%) 22.2% (19.6%)
Presence #1 (WS) 64.9% (8.7%) 65.2% (9.6%)
Presence #2 (SUS) 55.2% (18.1%) 57.0% (16.1%)
Heart rate (beats/min) 105.15 (18.74) 104.98 (9.02) 103.29 (12.99)
Electrodermal activity (counts/min) 42.76 (9.42) 41.73 (17.62) 40.03 (16.45)

Average values for motion sickness (Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire) and presence questionnaires, along with average heart rate and electrodermal activity during training for both virtual reality (VR) groups and unaltered view (n = 10 for each group). Standard deviations are in parentheses. Presence #1 refers to Witmer & Singer Presence Questionnaire; presence #2 refers to Slater-Usoh-Steed Questionnaire. We found no significant differences across groups for these measures (ANOVA P > 0.05).