Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;123:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.02.002

Table 2.

Convergent validity of CECA and CTQ childhood adversity ratings.

Cases
Controls
rt s.e. P rt s.e. P
Physical abuse‡ 0.61 0.08 <0.001 0.87 0.05 <0.001
Sexual abusea 0.80 0.07 <0.001 0.86 0.06 <0.001
Emotional abuseb 0.78 0.07 <0.001 0.86 0.07 <0.001

CECA, Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse interview. CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. † Absence of abuse defined as a CECA rating of none/mild; Presence of abuse defined as a CECA rating of moderate/severe; ‡ Absence of physical abuse defined as CTQ total scores of 5-9; Presence defined as CTQ total scores of 10+

a

Absence of sexual abuse defined as CTQ total scores of 5–7; Presence defined as CTQ total scores of 8+.

b

Absence of emotional abuse defined as CTQ total scores of 5–12; Presence defined as CTQ total scores of 13+.