Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 12;43(2):247–256. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1543094

Table 2. Participants’ characteristics by style of prevention.

Prevention style ID Number Sex Age Years using a wheelchair SCI Characteristics Number of PI(s)
Thoughtfuls T1 w 57 30 Paraplegia, T11, motor complete, sensory complete, flaccid 0
  T2 m 81 52 Paraplegia, T5, motor complete, sensory complete, spastic 0
  T3 m 54 10 Tetraplegia, C2-3, motor complete, sensory complete, spastic 0
  T4 m 54 7 Paraplegia, T11-12, motor complete, sensory complete, flaccid 1
  T5 m 59 35 Paraplegia, L11-12, motor complete, sensory complete, flaccid >1
Selectives S1 m 60 40 Paraplegia, T4, motor complete, sensory incomplete, spastic 0
  S2 w 58 37 Tetraplegia, C6-7 incomplete, T2 complete, motor complete, sensory incomplete, spastic 0
  S3 w 58 9 Tetraplegia, C5, motor complete, sensory incomplete, spastic 0
  S4 w 47 37 Paraplegia, T6, motor complete, sensory complete, spastic 1
  S5 m 26 37 Tetraplegia, C5-6, motor complete, sensory incomplete, spastic 1
  S6 m 57 35 Tetraplegia, T2-3 complete, C5 incomplete, motor complete, sensory incomplete, spastic 1
  S7 w 48 23 Tetraplegia, C6-7 incomplete, T4 complete, motor complete, sensory incomplete, spastic 1
  S8 w 45 41 Paraplegia, L2, motor complete, sensory complete, flaccid >1
  S9 m 42 25 Paraplegia, T4-5, motor complete, sensory complete, flaccid >1
  S10 m 27 13 Tetraplegia, C6, motor complete, sensory complete, flaccid >1
Delegators D1 m 47 25 Paraplegia, T8-11, motor complete, sensory incomplete, spastic 1
  D2 m 68 47 Paraplegia, T9, motor complete, sensory complete, flaccid >1
  D3 m 45 17 Tetraplegia, C3-5, motor complete, sensory complete, spastic >1