Table 2.
A performance comparison of biocomposite-based flash memory
| Biocomposite unit | Window (operation voltage) | Channel length/width (μm) | ON/OFF ratio | Endurance | Retention (s) | Mobility (cm2/Vs) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferritin/Co-BND | 4 (±10) | – | – | 105 | 104 | 200 | [78] |
| Silk/MWCNT/CdS | 9.8 (±10) | – | – | – | 103 | – | [80] |
| Silk/PVA | 5 | 100/10,000 | 104 | 300 | 104 | 0.22 | [86] |
| Silk/CDs | 16.8 (±50) | 50/1000 | 105 | 500 | 7 × 106 | – | [83] |
| α-synuclein/AuNP | 40 (±60) | 50/500 | 104 | 7 | 107 | – | [84] |
| Maltoheptaose-b-PS | 52.7 (±50) | 50/1000 | 108 | 200 | 104 | 0.59 | [87] |
| Chitosan/Y2O3 | – | – | 105 | – | – | 0.09 | [91] |
| Chitosan/H3PO4 | 40 (±60) | 50/500 | 106 | 7 | 107 | 6.36 | [92] |
| DNA-CTMA | 7 (±10) | 35/3000 | 104 | 2 | 103 | – | [73] |