Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD001266. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001266.pub4

Karadag 2005 ‐ IPR.

Methods Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
Participants Setting: inpatients
 Infants less than 1 year of age, hospitalized for moderate to severe bronchiolitis, first episode of wheezing. Chest X‐ray compatible with bronchiolitis. Mean age 5.1 ± 2.7 months. No prematurity; chronic neurological or cardiopulmonary disease, including asthma; proven or suspected acute bacterial infection; previous treatment with bronchodilators or corticosteroids; infants younger than 4 weeks old and who needed ventilation at neonatal period; symptoms present for more than 7 days; fever higher than 38.5 °C; or infants with mild bronchiolitis.
 Country: Turkey
Interventions Group 1: nebulized salbutamol solution (Ventolin, Glaxo) plus saline solution (0.9%) 2.5 ml every 6 hours. Group 2: ipratropium bromide (Atrovent, Boehringer Ingelheim) 250 µg/2 ml plus 3 ml saline solution every 6 hours
 Group 3: normal saline received 5 ml every 6 hours
Outcomes Changes in the oxygen saturation rates, clinical scores and duration of hospital stay. Adverse effects were recorded, i.e. tachycardia and tremor after nebulization of each medication
 The clinical score system was based on respiratory rate, degree of wheezing, degree of accessory muscle use and general condition, described by Wang 1992. Improvement was defined as a decrease by 2 points in the total clinical score
Notes Ipratropium (IPR) treatment group: in order to represent the results from the 2 bronchodilator treatment arms (ipratropium and salbutamol), this study is listed twice. The placebo group was divided between comparisons to avoid double‐counting of placebo participants
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk  
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk  
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk  
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk  
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Data on heart rate mentioned but not presented in results