Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 20;2019(1):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub6

Li 2000b.

Methods Women 'randomly allocated' to 2 groups. Method of randomisation not reported
Participants 160 women attending a family planning clinic in Tianjing, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and attended the clinic within 72 h of a single act of unprotected intercourse
Interventions Mife 50 mg vs Mife 25 mg single dose
Outcomes Observed number of pregnancies, side effects and changes in menstrual pattern
Notes
  1. Post‐randomisation exclusions or loss to follow‐up not reported

  2. Observed pregnancy/total number women: Mife 50 mg 0/79; Mife 25 mg 2/78

  3. Change in menstrual pattern: not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Mentioned randomisation but description not adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Post‐randomisation exclusions or loss to follow‐up not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reported planned outcomes
Other bias Low risk None detected