Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 20;2019(1):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub6

Sheng 2002.

Methods Women 'randomly allocated' to 2 groups. Method of randomisation not reported
Participants 200 women attending a family planning centre, Jiangsu, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and attended the clinic within 72 h of a single act of unprotected intercourse
Interventions Mife 10 mg single dose vs LNG 0.75 mg, 2‐dose regimen, orally
Outcomes Observed number of pregnancies, side effects and changes in menstrual pattern
Notes
  1. Post‐randomisation exclusion or loss to follow‐up not reported

  2. Observed pregnancy/expected pregnancy/total number of women: Mife 1/10/100; LNG 2/11/100

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Mentioned randomisation but description not adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Post‐randomisation exclusion or loss to follow‐up not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reported planned outcomes
Other bias Low risk None detected