Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;17:38. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00669-3

Table 3.

Regaining walking ability, changes in Functional Ambulation Categories adjusted by the number of gait training sessions

Central diagnoses Peripheral diagnoses
Total sample (n = 780) STI (n = 329) STH (n = 131) CIPM (n = 74)
FCadj 95%CI p value FCadj 95%CI p value FCadj 95%CI p value FCadj 95%CI p value
FAC at t0
 0 1.8* 1.7; 2.0 < 0.001 2.1* 1.9; 2.3 < 0.001 1.9* 1.8; 2.1 < 0.001 1.7* 1.5; 1.8 < 0.001
 1 1.5* 1.2; 1.9 < 0.001 1.6* 1.2; 2.1 < 0.001 1.6* 1.2; 2.0 < 0.001 1.4* 1.0; 1.7 < 0.001
 2 1.2* 0.9; 1.5 < 0.001 1.4* 0.9; 1.8 < 0.001 1.2* 0.8; 1.5 < 0.001 1.0* 0.7; 1.3 < 0.001
 3 0.9 0.6; 1.2 < 0.001 0.8 0.5; 1.2 < 0.001 0.9 0.6; 1.2 < 0.001 0.8 0.5; 1.1 < 0.001
 4 0.5 0.2; 0.8 < 0.001 0.5 0.1; 0.9 0.048 0.5 0.2; 0.8 0.013 0.5 0.2; 0.8 0.006
 5

FAC- Functional Ambulation Categories,

FCadj FAC change adjusted by the number of gait training sessions received – adjusted mean gain in walking ability between t0(start of rehabilitation) and t1(end of inpatient rehabilitation) revealed by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) using number of gait training sessions as co-variate and computation of least squares mean estimates for the classes FAC at t0,

95%CI – 95% Confidence interval for the adjusted mean FC (95%CIs for the least squares mean estimates for the classes FAC at t0),

p value- derived from ANCOVA least squares estimates for FAC at t0, *p < 0.05 and clinically relevant (minimal improvement by one FAC point),

STI ischemic stroke,

STH hemorrhagic stroke,

CIPM Critical Illness Polyneuropathy or -Myopathy