Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;40(10):2094–2107. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1650-18.2019

Table 3.

Proportional and absolute frontal volume measurements between species

Volume measures Human (mean ± SD) Vervet (mean ± SD) Macaque (mean ± SD) Post hoc comparisons (p values)
Human versus vervet Human versus macaque Vervet versus macaque
Frontal Cortex (voxel-based)
    Proportion (%) 32.69 ± 0.79 28.89 ± 0.79 29.12 ± 1.22 0.002 0.004 0.938
    Absolute (ml) 95.27 ± 8.45 2.68 ± 0.13 3.16 ± 0.57 <0.001 <0.001 0.271
Frontal white matter (voxel-based)
    Proportion 40.80 ± 0.62 23.33 ± 0.72 23.19 ± 1.04 <0.001 <0.001 0.974
    Absolute 96.69 ± 7.93 2.33 ± 0.19 2.92 ± 0.59 <0.001 <0.001 0.182
Frontal tracts (tractography)
    Proportion 66.18 ± 2.56 48.16 ± 2.94 47.98 ± 4.54 0.001 0.001 0.997
    Absolute 382.60 ± 45.30 11.91 ± 2.04 13.48 ± 2.80 <0.001 <0.001 0.618
Anterior commissure (tractography)
    Proportion 4.59 ± 1.15 9.90 ± 1.30 7.86 ± 1.80 0.004 0.028 0.091
    Absolute 26.73 ± 7.91 2.46 ± 0.56 2.18 ± 0.56 <0.001 <0.001 0.754

Frontal and nonfrontal (anterior commissure) volume measures in humans (n = 20), vervets (n = 4), and macaques (n = 5). Descriptive statistics and Games-Howell post hoc comparisons between species are given for proportional (normalized by total volume for each measure) and absolute volumes. See Results for Welch's ANOVA statistics.