Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;40(10):2094–2107. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1650-18.2019

Table 4.

Proportional and absolute frontal tract group volume measurements between species

Tract group Human (mean ± SD) Vervet (mean ± SD) Macaque (mean ± SD) Post hoc comparisons (p values)
Human versus vervet Human versus macaque Vervet versus macaque
Association
    Proportion (%) 36.69 ± 3.13 25.92 ± 3.48 23.15 ± 6.46 0.010 0.018 0.706
    Absolute (ml) 211.92 ± 27.19 6.36 ± 0.92 6.64 ± 2.52 <0.001 <0.001 0.972
Commissural
    Proportion 34.58 ± 3.30 27.85 ± 3.67 26.19 ± 5.76 0.002 0.014 0.989
    Absolute 200.42 ± 32.31 6.93 ± 1.67 7.42 ± 2.22 <0.001 <0.001 0.924
Projection
    Proportion 14.52 ± 1.44 4.80 ± 1.82 5.14 ± 2.25 0.001 0.001 0.937
    Absolute 83.60 ± 9.78 1.22 ± 0.59 1.50 ± 0.78 <0.001 <0.001 0.818
Intrafrontal
    Proportion 16.33 ± 1.77 9.50 ± 0.73 7.79 ± 1.04 <0.001 <0.001 0.055
    Absolute 94.53 ± 14.68 2.34 ± 0.34 2.17 ± 0.45 <0.001 <0.001 0.806

Association, commissural, projection, and intrafrontal tract group volumes in humans (n = 20), vervets (n = 4), and macaques (n = 5). Descriptive statistics and Games-Howell post hoc comparisons between species are given for proportional (normalized by total volume for each measure) and absolute volumes. See Results for Welch's ANOVA statistics.