Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Amorín 1989 Unable to trace
Awad 2007 Methodology and interventions did not satisfy inclusion criteria
Baier 2002 Fully translated: retrospective, not a clinical trial
Bascom 2002 Case study
Christensen 1985 Paper translated: participant group contained acute abscess
Collazo 1994 RCT stopped prior to endpoints being reached: 11 participants only: poor description of results and outcomes
De Falco 2007 Paper translated: retrospective cohort study
Duxbury 2003 Interventions did not satisfy inclusion criteria
Faltz 1990 Translated: interventions did not satisfy inclusion criteria
Golz 1980 Case series description without comparison group
Gupta 2004 Interventions did not satisfy inclusion criteria
Gupta 2005 Interventions did not satisfy inclusion criteria
Hell 1971 Translated: unclear study design
Hodgson 1981 Poor methodology: inadequate description of results: large losses to follow up
Hollingworth 1992 Series of letters
Hosseini 2006 Included participants with acute abscess
Khalid 2001 Unable to trace
Maniscalco 2001 Paper translated: retrospective cohort study
Mann 1987 Case series
Marks 1985 Not an RCT: interventions did not satisfy inclusion criteria
Morrison 1985 Large proportion of cases were pilonidal abscesses
Notaras 1970 Review article
Oncel 2002 Interventions did not appear to satisfy inclusion criteria: attempt to contact author: no reply
Ortiz 1977a Interventions did not appear to satisfy inclusion criteria: attempt to contact author: no reply
Ortiz 1977b Spanish language version of Ortiz 1977a
Petersen 2002 Review article
Reidler 1978 Translated: retrospective review
Sturniolo 1984 Translated: not a clinical trial
Søndenaa 2002 Intervention is antibiotic usage
Søreide 2009 Review article
Watson 2005 Letter
Werkgartner 2004 Editorial
Wienart 2004 Review article