for the main comparison.
Riluzole compared with placebo for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND) | ||||||
Patient or population: patients with ALS/MND Settings: large European and US ALS centers Intervention: riluzole Comparison: placebo | ||||||
Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of Participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | |||||
Placebo | Riluzole | |||||
Mortality or tracheostomy at 12 months (pooled hazard ratio)(riluzole 100 mg) | 510 per 1000 | 419 per 1000 (367 to 475) | HR 0.83 (0.70 to 1.00) |
1282 (3 studies) |
++++ high | When the results of the third trial of older and more seriously affected patients were included, the results were still significant (P = 0.046). This relative effect represents a three month increase in median survival from 11.8 to 14.8 months |
Per cent mortality at 12 months (riluzole 100 mg) | 440 per 1000 | 343 per 1000 (286 to 405) | RR 0.78 (0.65 to 0.92) | 799 (3 studies) | ++++ high | |
Rate of decline of Norris Scale ‐ Norris Limb
(riluzole 100 mg) Follow up: 12 months |
23.1 per year weighted mean rate of decline | The mean rate of decline of Norris Scale ‐ Norris Limb in the intervention groups was 3.94 slower (7.25 to 0.64 slower) | 731 (3 studies) | ++++ high | Although the change in function was not significant in the individual studies, the pooled data show a slower decline of limb function in the treated group | |
Rate of decline of Norris Scale ‐ Norris Bulbar
(riluzole 100 mg) Follow up: 12 months |
11.1 per year weighted mean rate of decline | The mean rate of decline of Norris Scale ‐ Norris Bulbar in the intervention groups was 2.06 slower (3.86 to 0.27 slower) | 742 (3 studies) | ++++ high | Although the change in function was not significant in the individual studies, the pooled data show a slower decline of bulbar function in the treated group | |
Adverse event: nausea | 91 per 1000 | 142 per 1000 (96 to 207) | RR 1.55 (1.06 to 2.28) | 801 3 studies |
++++ high | |
Adverse event: asthenia | 116 per 1000 | 175 per 1000 (124 to 246) | RR 1.5 (1.07 to 2.12) | 801 3 studies |
++++ high | |
Adverse event: 3‐fold increase in alanine transferase | 49 per 1000 | 129 per 1000 (78 to 211) | RR 2.62 (1.59 to 4.31) | 801 3 studies |
++++ high | |
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; HR: hazard ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate. |