Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;62(3):310–318. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0004OC

Table 1.

Linear Regression Analysis Comparing Contractile and Inflammatory Parameters with Viral Load

Variables Plotted (Fold Change vs. Control) R2 Value P Value
IP-10 release vs. RV-C15 detected 0.28 0.36
IL-6 release vs. RV-C15 detected 0.22 0.42
MIP-1β vs. RV-C15 detected 0.96 0.003
Change in sensitivity (Log EC50) vs. RV-C15 detected 0.29 0.35
Change in total response (AUC) vs. RV-C15 0.03 0.79
IP-10 release vs. change in total response (AUC) 0.14 0.53
IL-6 release vs. change in total response (AUC) 0.86 0.02
MIP-1β vs. change in total response (AUC) 0.05 0.71
Change in sensitivity (Log EC50) vs. IL-6 release 0.01 0.87
Change in sensitivity (Log EC50) vs. IP-10 release 0.06 0.69
Change in sensitivity (Log EC50) vs. MIP-1β release 0.45 0.45

Definition of abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve; IP-10 = IFN-γ–induced protein 10; Log EC50 = log of effective concentration to induce 50% bronchoconstriction; MIP-1β = macrophage inflammatory protein-1β; RV-C15 = rhinovirus C15.

Data represent n = 5 separate donors.