Table 1.
Linear Regression Analysis Comparing Contractile and Inflammatory Parameters with Viral Load
Variables Plotted (Fold Change vs. Control) | R2 Value | P Value |
---|---|---|
IP-10 release vs. RV-C15 detected | 0.28 | 0.36 |
IL-6 release vs. RV-C15 detected | 0.22 | 0.42 |
MIP-1β vs. RV-C15 detected | 0.96 | 0.003 |
Change in sensitivity (Log EC50) vs. RV-C15 detected | 0.29 | 0.35 |
Change in total response (AUC) vs. RV-C15 | 0.03 | 0.79 |
IP-10 release vs. change in total response (AUC) | 0.14 | 0.53 |
IL-6 release vs. change in total response (AUC) | 0.86 | 0.02 |
MIP-1β vs. change in total response (AUC) | 0.05 | 0.71 |
Change in sensitivity (Log EC50) vs. IL-6 release | 0.01 | 0.87 |
Change in sensitivity (Log EC50) vs. IP-10 release | 0.06 | 0.69 |
Change in sensitivity (Log EC50) vs. MIP-1β release | 0.45 | 0.45 |
Definition of abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve; IP-10 = IFN-γ–induced protein 10; Log EC50 = log of effective concentration to induce 50% bronchoconstriction; MIP-1β = macrophage inflammatory protein-1β; RV-C15 = rhinovirus C15.
Data represent n = 5 separate donors.