Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):725–734. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1364-2

Table 2.

Linear regression of nationality on patient identification at differing levels of perceived susceptibility by cancer status (N = 329)

Patients with cancer (n = 88)
Patients in remission (n = 241)
Predictor variable B (SE) t 95% CI B (SE) t 95% CI
Age
 Age − 0.03 (0.02) − 1.47 − 0.06, 0.01 0.00 (0.01) 0.37 − 0.01, 0.02
 Race − 0.05 (0.57) − 0.08 − 1.19, 1.10 − 0.15 (0.34) − 0.45 − 0.83, 0.52
 Education − 0.20 (0.34) − 0.60 − 0.89, 0.48 − 0.17 (0.21) − 0.81 − 0.57, 0.24
 Income − 0.25 (0.42) − 0.59 − 1.10, 0.59 0.14 (0.20) 0.70 − 0.25, 0.53
 Sex − 0.25 (0.72) − 0.35 − 1.70, 1.19 0.14 (0.39) 0.36 − 0.62, 0.90
 Colorectal cancer − 1.02 (0.85) − 1.20 − 2.71, 0.68 0.21 (0.33) 0.62 − 0.45, 0.87
 Lung cancer − 1.56 (0.74)* − 2.11 − 3.03, −0.08 0.25 (0.36) 0.70 − 0.46, 0.97
 Prostate cancer − 0.44 (0.76) − 0.58 − 1.95, 1.08 0.24 (0.44) 0.53 − 0.64, 1.11
 Ask CCT − 0.35 (0.53) − 0.67 − 1.41, 0.71 1.05 (0.62) 1.70 − 0.17, 2.27
Predictors
 Perceived sus. (PS) − 0.63 (.39) − 1.60 − 1.41, 0.16 0.32 (0.12)** 2.79 0.09, 0.54
 Nationality − 5.62 (1.56)*** − 3.61 − 8.73, − 2.52 0.32 (0.73) 0.43 − 1.13, 1.76
Interaction
 PS × nationality 1.48 (0.44)*** 3.39 0.61, 2.35 − 0.07 (0.23) − 0.28 − 0.53, 0.39
R2 0.40*** 0.08
 ΔR2 0.11*** 0.00

Cases with missing values across the variables were not included in the analysis (n = 14)

PS × nationality, perceived susceptibility x nationality; Ask CCT, patient previously asked to participate in a cancer clinical trial; R2, the variance in identification explained by the model; ΔR2, increase in variance due to interaction between perceived susceptibility and nationality

p ≤ 0.05;

**

p ≤ 0.01;

***

p ≤ .001