Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;7(2):e15520. doi: 10.2196/15520

Table 7.

Generalized estimation equation with complete cases for score difference in quality of life, life satisfaction, and mindfulness scales

Score change at Full intervention compared with control, mean score difference Partial intervention compared with control, mean score difference

Unadjusted (SE)a P valueb Adjustedc (SE) P value Unadjusted (SE) P value Adjusted (SE) P value
Quality of Life Scale 16-item

T2d 3.04 (2.40) .21 4.16 (2.86) .15 3.16 (2.80) .26 8.57 (3.81) .03

T3e 8.67 (2.37) <.001 9.86 (2.83) <.001 7.21 (2.76) .01 12.85 (3.78) <.001
Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale- Peabody Treatment Progress Battery 6-item

T2 1.34 (0.73) .07 0.49 (1.03) .64 0.28 (0.91) .76 −0.08 (1.36) .95

T3 2.69 (0.73) <.001 1.85 (1.02) .07 1.66 (0.90) .07 1.32 (1.35) .33
Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form 24-item

T2 4.96 (2.50) .05 3.02 (3.26) .36 −0.62 (1.98) .75 1.50 (2.74) .59

T3 7.80 (2.48) .002 6.02 (3.25) .07 4.44 (1.95) .03 6.83 (2.72) .01

aSE of the mean score difference.

bP values <.02 are considered significant (shown in italic) to account for multiple comparisons.

cAdjusted for sex, age, country of birth, paid work, unpaid work, self-rated health, vigorous physical activities, and access to mental health private counseling via insurance.

dT2: 4 weeks.

eT3: 8 weeks.