Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;8(2):e16499. doi: 10.2196/16499

Table 5.

Change in secondary outcomes from baseline to the end of the intervention for all participants (n=209, using imputed dataset).

Outcome Facebook Facebook plus text Control P valuea

Mean baseline value (SE) Mean change (95% CI) Mean baseline value (SE) Mean change (95% CI) Mean baseline value (SE) Mean change (95% CI)
Habit formation score (out of 28) 15.7 (0.7) 3.5 (1.6 to 5.3) 16.4 (0.8) 0.5 (0.93 to 2.0) 15.3 (0.8) 3.4 (1.7 to 5.2) .01
Overall knowledge score (out of 18) 6.7 (0.3) 1.6 (0.6 to 2.5) 6.3 (0.3) 2.9 (2.0 to 3.8) 6.6 (0.3) 0.2 (−0.7 to 1.1) <.001
Motivation score (out of 16) 10.4 (0.4) 1.0 (0.3 to 1.7) 10.4 (0.3) 1.0 (0.3 to 1.8) 10.5 (0.3) 1.1 (0.4 to 1.9) .79
Self-efficacy (out of 25) 19.4 (0.6) 1.2 (−0.1 to 2.4) 19.5 (0.5) 0.5 (−0.8 to 1.8) 17.8 (0.6) 1.0 (−0.4 to 2.4) .31

aCovariates appearing in the linear regression model have been adjusted for gender, Socio-Economic Indexes For Areas, cooking frequency, baseline milk intake, baseline calcium intake, baseline knowledge, baseline habit, baseline motivation, and baseline self-efficacy.