Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan 7;156(3):591–597. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.038

Table 1.

Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of MIS versus open radical hysterectomy

Variable MIS N (%) OPEN N (%) P
N 117 (59.7) 79 (40.3)
Approach
 Robotic 106 (90.6) -
 Laparoscopic 9 (7.7) -
 Converted to open 2 (1.7) -
Age, years Median (range) 46 (28–71) 44 (23–85) 0.59
BMI, kg/m2 Median (range) 27.2 (17.7–51.5) 25.9 (17.9–45) 0.46
FIGO 2009 Stage 0.24
 IA1 with LVI 2 (1.7) 1 (1.3)
 IA2 12 (10.3) 3 (3.8)
 IB1 103 (88) 75 (94.9)
Histology 0.52
 SCC 48 (41) 26 (32.9)
 Adenocarcinoma 65 (55.6) 50 (63.3)
 Adenosquamous 4 (3.4) 3 (3.8)
Clinical tumor size, cm Median (range) 0 (0–4) 0 (0–4) 0.16
Path tumor size, cm Median (range) 1.6 (0.2–7.5) 1.9 (0.4–8.6) 0.17
Tumor size
 <=2 cm 80 (74.1) 52 (69.3) 0.7
 >2 cm 28 (25.9) 23 (30.7)
Margin positive 2 (1.7) 2(2.5) 1.0
LVI 0.33
 Yes 41 (35) 35 (44.3)
 Suspicious 6 (5.1) 2(2.5)
Node positive 20 (17.1) 23 (29.1) 0.046
Rt parametria area, cm2 Median (range) 7.0 (0.44–34.20) 6.5 (0.9–25.0) 0.39
Lt parametria area, cm2 Median (range) 7.5 (0.84–22.75) 7.3 (0.9–24.5) 0.67
Adjuvant therapy 39 (33.3%) 42 (53.2%) 0.006
No residual in hysterectomy 29 (24.8%) 8 (10.1%) 0.01

MIS, minimally invasive surgery; BMI, body mass index; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma