Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 18;26(5):1094–1104. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0909

Table 1.

A: Characteristics of all gliomas (WHO grades II-IV) implanted
Viable (N=94) Non-viable (N=167)
WHO Histologic Grade (at Implant)
 II 0 9 (5)
 III 0 50 (30)
 IV 94 (100) 107 (64)
 Indeterminate 0 1 (1)
Diagnosis
 Glioblastoma, IDH-mutant (WHO IV) 2 (2) 11 (7)
 Glioblastoma, NOS* (WHO IV) 0 37 (22)
 Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (WHO IV) 91 (97) 59 (35)
  Gliosarcoma 4 3
  Glioblastoma with primitive neuronal component 1 0
 Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant (WHO IV) 1 (1) 0
 Other diagnoses** 0 60 (36)
B: Patient characteristics of WHO grade IV gliomas implanted
Viable N=94 Non-Viable N=107
Mean age, years (range) 58.3 (21 – 84) 56.5 (16 – 85)
Male, n (%) 57 (61) 65 (61)
Tumor Type Implanted
 Primary 60 (64) 60 (56)
 Recurrent 27 (29) 40 (37)
 Recurrent in progression from lower-grade 7 (7) 7 (6)
Therapy prior to engraftment
 None 60 (64) 60 (56)
 RT, TMZ 12 (13) 20 (19)
 RT, TMZ, other therapy 19 (20) 25 (23)
 RT 0 0 (0)
 Other therapy combination 3 (3) 2 (2)

Values are n (%) unless indicated.

Updated to reflect 2016 WHO Classification (48).

*

NOS, not otherwise specified denotes no IDH testing performed.

Glioblastoma variant or subtype.

**

Details in Table S1. RT=radiation therapy; TMZ=temozolomide.