TABLE 2.
Loci significantly associated with FHB resistance in at least two environments identified in 240 wheat accessions using the MLM model in Tassel v5.0.
| Markera | Variantb | Chrc | Physical positiond (Mb) | Environment | P-value | R2e (%) | P-value for plant heightf | P-value for days to floweringf |
| IWB75039 | A/G | 1AS | 10.0 | 2016, 2017 | 3.12 E-04 | 5.6, 5.6 | 0.650 | 0.113 |
| Xgwm539 | Wuhan 1 allele/ others | 2DL | 513.1 | 2016, BLUE | 2.80 E-05 | 10.3, 7.5 | 0.258 | 0.062 |
| IWB21456 | A/G | 5AS | 9.6 | 2014, 2015, BLUE | 2.58 E-04 | 5.0, 5.0, 5.7 | 0.003 | 0.608 |
| IWB42293 | A/G | 5AL | 540.6 | 2015, BLUE | 4.68 E-04 | 4.9, 5.4 | 0.031 | 0.110 |
| IWB15569 | C/T | 7DS | 23.5 | 2016, 2017 | 4.34 E-04 | 4.9, 5.6 | 0.367 | 0.054 |
aRepresentative markers showing the strongest association with the resistance locus; bFavorable allele is underlined; cChr: Chromosome; dPhysical positions based on the Chinese Spring reference genome sequences from the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC, http://www.wheatgenome.org); ePercentage of phenotypic variance explained; fP-values for association between the representative markers of FHB QTL and plant height and flowering time in WAPS population calculated by Tassel v5.0 using the MLM model.