Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;11:328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00328

TABLE 3.

Models and corresponsive proportion of each class.

Class Proportion of each class (%) Model

1 2 3 4 5

1 100 (–) (–) (–) (–)
2 56.4 43.6 (–) (–) (–)
3 41.4 51.1 7.5 (–) (–) LCGA
4 14.6 50.5 7.1 27.8 (–)
5 5.2 15.1 17.5 22.7 39.5

1 100 (–) (–) (–) (–)
2 18.9 81.1 (–) (–) (–)
3 6.5 39.1 54.4 (–) (–) GMMI
4 18.3 46.7 30.4 4.6 (–)
5 15.9 9.7 16.8 22.1 35.5

1 100 (–) (–) (–) (–)
2 35.9 64.1 (–) (–) (–)
3 11.9 59.3 28.8 (–) (–) GMML
4 9.1 24.5 49.4 17.0 (–)
5 23.0 4.7 18.1 15.0 39.2

1 100 (–) (–) (–) (–)
2 66.0 34.0 (–) (–) (–)
3 6.1 64.6 29.3 (–) (–) GMMIL
4 6.2 29.0 9.5 55.3 (–)
5 27.9 6.2 9.9 52.5 3.5

The chosen model for the trajectories of cynicism is bold. LCGA = latent class growth analysis; GMMI = growth mixture model with estimated intercept variances; GMML = growth mixture model with estimated slope variances; GMMIL = growth mixture model with estimated intercept and slope variances.