Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 20;15(3):367–374. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08060719

Table 2.

Median (interquartile range) values of eGFR (in ml/min per 1.73 m2) and proteinuria (in g/d) by quintile of socioeconomic position

Parameter Quintile 1 (Lowest) Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 (Highest) P Valuea
Membranous nephropathy
 eGFR 83 (43–102) 77 (46–92) 74 (39–96) 75 (53–97) 78 (49–96) 0.82
 Proteinuria 5.6 (3.3–9.0) 5.4 (3.6–8.7) 6.1 (2.8–8.7) 5.8 (2.9–10.0) 5.7 (3.0–8.3) 0.99
IgA nephropathy
 eGFR 56 (35–83) 52 (27–82) 54 (30–76) 58 (36–83) 57 (33–72) 0.75
 Proteinuria 1.4 (0.8–3.2) 1.6 (0.8–3.0) 1.6 (0.8–3.0) 1.7 (0.8–2.9) 1.7 (0.9–3.2) 0.92
FSGS
 eGFR 45 (22–86) 47 (24–71) 47 (22–80) 33 (22–50) 42 (28–67) 0.39
 Proteinuria 3 (1.6–5.6) 3 (1.1–5.3) 2.6 (1.3–4.1) 2.7 (1.3–6.0) 3 (1.1–6.0) 0.83
ANCA-related GN
 eGFR 18 (11–32) 16 (11–25) 20 (11–34) 16 (10–31) 18 (11–32) 0.61
 Proteinuria 1.2 (0.6–2.3) 1.2 (0.5–2.0) 1.4 (0.9–2.4) 0.9 (0.4–2.1) 0.9 (0.6–2.2) 0.23
Lupus nephritis
 eGFR 74 (47–102) 81 (39–105) 84 (57–116) 70 (45–107) 79 (42–107) 0.48
 Proteinuria 1.9 (1.0–4.2) 2.6 (1.5–4.0) 2.6 (1.1–4.0) 2.9 (1.4–4.3) 2.0 (0.9–3.8) 0.64
a

Kruskal–Wallis test for difference across quintiles of socioeconomic position.