Table 3. Method Validation and Comparison of the Two Peptide Selection Methods (n = 3).
| recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| peptides | linearity | LOD (mg/kg) | LOQ (mg/kg) | spiked level (mg/kg) | intraday | interday | BSA content (mg/kg) | |
| LVNELTEFAK | Y = 1.27059*X – 1.05696 | 0.78 | 2.59 | 50 | 96.43 | 4.22 | 8.18 | 169.3 ± 8.0 |
| 200 | 104.92 | 1.78 | 7.77 | |||||
| R = 0.9995 | 500 | 104.08 | 2.58 | 6.74 | ||||
| YLYEIAR | Y = 1.11458*X – 0.401474 | 0.78 | 2.59 | 50 | 94.77 | 3.65 | 9.43 | 170.5 ± 3.7 |
| 200 | 104.06 | 3.18 | 9.84 | |||||
| R = 0.9999 | 500 | 103.17 | 4.46 | 9.83 | ||||
| QTALVELLK | Y = 1.4148*X – 1.08762 | 1.99 | 6.63 | 50 | 97.25 | 3.09 | 9.36 | 161.2 ± 6.1 |
| 200 | 96.91 | 4.73 | 8.24 | |||||
| R = 0.9996 | 500 | 98.11 | 4.43 | 9.36 | ||||
| AEFVEVTK | Y = 1.15335*X – 0.689148 | 0.86 | 2.88 | 50 | 88.03 | 4.03 | 8.44 | 152.5 ± 6.0 |
| 200 | 98.22 | 3.47 | 7.54 | |||||
| R = 0.9998 | 500 | 102.63 | 4.73 | 9.47 | ||||
| LGEYGFQNALIVR | Y = 0.239964*X – 0.320657 | 15.6 | 52.0 | 50 | 102.21 | 17.91 | 46.66 | 121.4 ± 60.3 |
| 200 | 101.44 | 22.40 | 43.47 | |||||
| R = 0.9969 | 500 | 102.89 | 16.07 | 83.21 | ||||