Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;5(8):3809–3819. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02002

Table 3. Method Validation and Comparison of the Two Peptide Selection Methods (n = 3).

          recovery (%) RSD (%)
 
peptides linearity LOD (mg/kg) LOQ (mg/kg) spiked level (mg/kg) intraday   interday BSA content (mg/kg)
LVNELTEFAK Y = 1.27059*X – 1.05696 0.78 2.59 50 96.43 4.22 8.18 169.3 ± 8.0
200 104.92 1.78 7.77
R = 0.9995 500 104.08 2.58 6.74
YLYEIAR Y = 1.11458*X – 0.401474 0.78 2.59 50 94.77 3.65 9.43 170.5 ± 3.7
200 104.06 3.18 9.84
R = 0.9999 500 103.17 4.46 9.83
QTALVELLK Y = 1.4148*X – 1.08762 1.99 6.63 50 97.25 3.09 9.36 161.2 ± 6.1
200 96.91 4.73 8.24
R = 0.9996 500 98.11 4.43 9.36
AEFVEVTK Y = 1.15335*X – 0.689148 0.86 2.88 50 88.03 4.03 8.44 152.5 ± 6.0
200 98.22 3.47 7.54
R = 0.9998 500 102.63 4.73 9.47
LGEYGFQNALIVR Y = 0.239964*X – 0.320657 15.6 52.0 50 102.21 17.91 46.66 121.4 ± 60.3
200 101.44 22.40 43.47
R = 0.9969 500 102.89 16.07 83.21