Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2020 Feb 18;76(Pt 3):377–381. doi: 10.1107/S2056989020002042

Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and DFT studies of 1-[r-2,c-6-diphenyl-t-3-(propan-2-yl)piperidin-1-yl]ethan-1-one

P Periyannan a, M Beemarao a, K Karthik b, S Ponnuswamy b, K Ravichandran a,*
PMCID: PMC7057363  PMID: 32148879

The dihedral angles between the mean plane of the piperidine ring, which adopts a chair conformation, and the phenyl rings are 89.72 (8) and 48.32 (8)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked into chains along the b-axis direction by C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Keywords: crystal structure, piperidine derivative, Hirshfeld surface, DFT

Abstract

In the title compound, C22H27NO, the piperidine ring adopts a chair conformation. The dihedral angles between the mean plane of the piperidine ring and the phenyl rings are 89.78 (7) and 48.30 (8)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked into chains along the b-axis direction by C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The DFT/B3LYP/6–311 G(d,p) method was used to determine the HOMO–LUMO energy levels. The mol­ecular electrostatic potential surfaces were investigated by Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots were used to analyse the inter­molecular inter­actions in the mol­ecule.

Chemical context  

Piperidine is a heterocyclic six-membered ring containing nitro­gen as a hetero atom and is an essential structural part of many important drugs including paroxetine, raloxifene, haloperidol, droperidol and minoxidiln (Wagstaff et al., 2002). Piperidine derivatives exhibit a wide range of biological activities, such as anti­microbial, anti-inflammatory, anti­viral, anti­malarial and general anesthetic (Aridoss et al., 2009). The biological properties of piperidines are highly dependent on the type and position of substituents on the heterocyclic ring. 2,6-Disubstituted piperidine derivatives have been found to possess fungicidal, bactericidal and herbicidal activities (Mobio et al., 1989). Piperidine derivatives are the inter­mediate products in agrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, rubber vulcanization accelerators and are widely used as building block mol­ecules in many industries. Various piperidine derivatives are present in numerous alkaloids (Badorrey et al., 1999).graphic file with name e-76-00377-scheme1.jpg

This wide range of biological activities prompted us to synthesize novel 2,6-diphenyl piperdine derivatives. Against this background, the structure of the title compound has been determined.

Structural commentary  

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. The diphenyl-substituted piperidine compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n. The bond lengths and angles are well within the expected limits and comparable with literature values (Allen et al., 1998).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atomic numbering and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.

The piperidine ring adopts a chair conformation with the puckering parameters Q 2 = 0.6191 (15) Å and ϕ2 = 335.12 (14) Å. The piperidine ring (N1/C2–C6) makes dihed­ral angles of 89.78 (7) and 48.30 (8)°, respectively, with the C7–12 and C13–C18 phenyl rings, and confirms the fact that the moieties are in an axial orientations.

The keto and methyl groups substituted at atom C19 are equatorially orientated as confirmed from the torsion angle values O1—C19—N1—C2 = 177.54 (12)° and C20—C19—N1—C6 = 172.81 (11)°. In the mol­ecule, the isopropyl group substituted at the 5-position of the piperidine ring is equatorially oriented, as confirmed by the torsion angles of C4—C5—C21—C22 = −172.13 (14)° and C6—C5—C21—C23 = −174.73 (14)°. The sum of the bond angles (359.87°) around atom N1 of the piperidine ring is in accordance with the sp 2-hybridization state (Beddoes et al., 1986).

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked into C(8) chains along the b-axis direction by C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1, Fig. 2). The overall crystal packing of the title compound is shown in Fig. 3.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C9—H9⋯O1i 0.93 2.54 3.4378 (19) 163

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A partial view along the b axis of the crystal packing of the title compound, showing the formation of a mol­ecular chain by C—H⋯O inter­actions (dotted lines).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The overall crystal packing of the title compound, viewed along the b-axis direction. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines, and only the H atoms involved in hydrogen bonding have been included.

DFT study  

The optimized structure of the mol­ecule in the gas phase was generated theoretically via density functional theory (DFT) using standard B3LYP functional and 6-311G(d,p) basis-set calculations (Becke et al., 1993), as implemented in GAUSSIAN09 (Frisch et al., 2009).

The overlay diagram for the optimized structure (purple) and the structure in solid state (green) with respect to the piperidine ring is shown in Fig. 4. The piperidine rings in the two phases have an r.m.s deviation of 0.434 Å for the non-hydrogen atoms. The conformation of the mol­ecules in the two phases differs with respect to the central piperidine ring, as seen in the disparity of about 38.5° in the N1—C6—C5—C4 torsion angles (39.88/1.38°) and 2.25° in the N1—C2—C3—C4 torsion angles (44.41/39.81°) for the optimized and solid-state mol­ecules, respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A structural overlay diagram (Mercury; Macrae et al., 2020) for the optimized structure (purple) and the solid-state structure (green) of the title compound.

The highest-occupied mol­ecular orbital (HOMO), acting as an electron donor, and the lowest-unoccupied mol­ecular orbital (LUMO), acting as an electron acceptor, are known as frontier mol­ecular orbitals (FMOs). The FMOs play an important role in the optical and electric properties, as well as in quantum chemistry (Fleming, 1976). When the energy gap is small, the mol­ecule is highly polarizable and has high chemical reactivity. The electron distribution of the HOMO−1, HOMO, LUMO and LUMO+1 energy levels and the energy values are shown in Fig. 5. The positive and negative phases are shown in green and red, respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The frontier mol­ecular orbitals (FMOs) of the title compound.

The HOMO of the title mol­ecule is localized on the C=O group, one aromatic ring and the piperidine ring, while the LUMO is located over the whole mol­ecule expect for the isopropyl group. The DFT study shows that the FMO energies E HOMO and E LUMO are −4.804 and −1.694 eV, respectively, and the HOMO–LUMO energy gap is 3.110 eV. The title compound has a small frontier orbital gap, hence the mol­ecule has high chemical reactivity and low kinetic stability.

The electron affinity (I) and ionization potential (A) of the mol­ecule were calculated using the DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) basis set. A high value of the electrophilicity index describes a good electrophile, while a small value of electrophilicity index describes a good nucleophile. The values of the hardness (η), softness (σ), electronegativity (χ) and electrophilicity index (ω) for the title compound are given in Table 2.

Table 2. Calculated frontier mol­ecular orbital analysis of the title compound.

Parameter Value
EHOMO (eV) −4.804
ELUMO (eV) −1.694
Energy gap, ΔE (eV) 3.110
HOMO−1 (eV) −5.478
LUMO+1 (eV) −1.113
Ionization potential, I (eV) 4.804
Electron affinity, A 1.694
Electrophilicity Index, ω 3.394
Hardness, η 1.555
Electro negativity, χ 3.249
Softness, σ 0.322

Hirshfeld surface analysis  

CrystalExplorer17 (Turner et al., 2017) was used for the Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009) and to generate the associated two-dimensional fingerprint plots (McKinnon et al., 2007) to qu­antify the various inter­molecular inter­actions in the structure of the title compound. In the HS plotted over d norm (Fig. 6), the white surface indicates contacts with distances equal to the sum of the van der Waals radii, and the red and blue colours indicate distances shorter (in close contact) or longer (distinct contact) than the van der Waals radii, respectively (Venkatesan et al., 2016).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over (a) d norm, (b) shape-index, (c) curvedness and (d) fragment patches.

The HS mapped over curvedness and shape-index, introduced by Koendrink (Koenderink, 1990; Koenderink & van Doorn, 1992), give further chemical insight into mol­ecular packing. A surface with low curvedness designates a flat region and may be indicative of π–π stacking in the crystal. A Hirshfeld surface with high curvedness is highlighted as dark-blue edges, and is indicative of the absence of π–π stacking (Fig. 6). The nearest neighbour coordination environment of a mol­ecule is identified from the colour patches on the Hirshfeld surface, depending on their closeness to adjacent mol­ecules (Mohamooda Sumaya et al., 2018).

The 2D fingerprint plots of the d i and d e points for the contacts contributing to the Hirshfeld surface are shown in Fig. 7. They indicate that inter­molecular H⋯H contacts provide the largest contribution (74.2%) to the Hirshfeld surface. The percentage contributions of the other inter­actions are C⋯H/H⋯C = 18.7%, O⋯H/H⋯O = 7.0% and N⋯H/H⋯N = 0.1%. The Hirshfeld surface analysis confirms the importance of H-atom contacts in establishing the packing. The large number of H⋯H, H⋯C/C⋯H, H⋯O/O⋯H and H⋯N/N⋯H inter­actions suggest that hydrogen bonding and van der Waals inter­actions play the major roles in the crystal packing (Hathwar et al., 2015).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Two-dimensional fingerprint plot for the title compound showing the contributions of individual types of inter­actions: (a) all inter­molecular contacts, (b) H⋯H contacts, (c) C⋯H/H⋯C contacts, (d) O⋯H/H⋯O contacts, (e) N⋯H/H⋯N contacts.

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 5.39; Groom et al., 2016) using piperidine as the main skeleton revealed the presence of more than 30 records with different substituents on the piperidine ring. However, there are only two compounds with the same skeleton as the title compound, viz. r-2,c-6-di­phenyl­piperidine (NIKYEN; Maheshwaran et al., 2013) and methyl 4-oxo-r-2,c-6-di­phenyl­piperidine-3-carboxyl­ate (BIHZEY; Sampath et al., 2004). In these compounds, the piperidine ring adopts a chair conformation as the title compound. The phenyl rings substituted at the 2- and 6-positions of the piperidine ring subtend dihedral angles of 89.78 (7) and 48.30 (8)°, respectively, with the best plane of the piperidine ring in the title compound and 81.04 (7) and 81.10 (7)°, respectively, in NIKYEN, whereas in BIHZEY they are equatorially oriented. The C—H⋯O inter­action leads to the formation of a C(8) chain in the title compound, while it forms dimers in the other two structures.

Synthesis and crystallization  

t-3-Isopropyl-r-2,c-6-di­phenyl­piperidin-4-one was reduced to the corresponding piperidine using the Wolf–Kishner reduction (Ravindran & Jeyaraman, 1992). Piperidine-4-one (10 mmol) was treated with di­ethyl­ene glycol (40 ml), hydrazine hydrate (10 mmol) and KOH pellets (10 mmol) to give t-3-isopropyl-r-2,c-6-di­phenyl­piperidine. N-Acetyl piperidine was synthesized by the acetyl­ation of the above piperidine. To t-3-isopropyl-r-2,c-6-di­phenyl­piperidine (5 mmol) dissolved in benzene (50 ml) were added tri­ethyl­amine (20 mmol) and acetyl chloride (20 mmol) to give the title compound, which was crystallized by slow evaporation from a benzene/petroleum ether ( v : v = ?:?) solution.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. H atoms were positioned geometrically (N—H = 0.88–0.90 Å and C—H = 0.93–0.98 Å) and allowed to ride on their parent atoms,with U iso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H 1.2Ueq(C) for other H atoms.

Table 3. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C22H27NO
M r 321.44
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 296
a, b, c (Å) 13.3077 (5), 10.3009 (4), 13.9338 (5)
β (°) 104.657 (1)
V3) 1847.91 (12)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.07
Crystal size (mm) 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker SMART APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
T min, T max 0.979, 0.986
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 43393, 5246, 3546
R int 0.028
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.707
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.053, 0.169, 1.02
No. of reflections 5246
No. of parameters 221
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.45, −0.22

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT, SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and PLATON (Spek, 2020).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020002042/dx2023sup1.cif

e-76-00377-sup1.cif (1.3MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020002042/dx2023Isup2.hkl

e-76-00377-Isup2.hkl (417.5KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020002042/dx2023Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1814839

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the SAIF, IIT Madras, India, for the data collection.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C22H27NO F(000) = 696
Mr = 321.44 Dx = 1.155 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 13.3077 (5) Å Cell parameters from 3546 reflections
b = 10.3009 (4) Å θ = 1.9–30.2°
c = 13.9338 (5) Å µ = 0.07 mm1
β = 104.657 (1)° T = 296 K
V = 1847.91 (12) Å3 Block, white crystalline
Z = 4 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer 3546 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.028
ω and φ scans θmax = 30.2°, θmin = 1.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008) h = −18→18
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 0.986 k = −14→14
43393 measured reflections l = −19→19
5246 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full H-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0897P)2 + 0.2822P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.169 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.02 Δρmax = 0.45 e Å3
5246 reflections Δρmin = −0.22 e Å3
221 parameters Extinction correction: SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraints Extinction coefficient: 0.028 (3)

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C2 0.65890 (11) −0.04974 (12) 0.67960 (9) 0.0430 (3)
H2 0.710803 −0.117590 0.703575 0.052*
C3 0.55791 (12) −0.11907 (14) 0.63075 (11) 0.0535 (4)
H3A 0.509789 −0.058442 0.589793 0.064*
H3B 0.571443 −0.188289 0.588507 0.064*
C4 0.51045 (13) −0.17493 (14) 0.70987 (12) 0.0553 (4)
H4A 0.562934 −0.221549 0.758707 0.066*
H4B 0.455515 −0.235360 0.680048 0.066*
C5 0.46657 (10) −0.06466 (13) 0.75983 (10) 0.0434 (3)
H5 0.406942 −0.029180 0.710452 0.052*
C6 0.54640 (9) 0.04763 (12) 0.79099 (9) 0.0386 (3)
H6 0.561919 0.050544 0.863560 0.046*
C7 0.50324 (9) 0.18152 (12) 0.75655 (9) 0.0401 (3)
C8 0.44865 (11) 0.20754 (15) 0.65996 (11) 0.0509 (3)
H8 0.438587 0.141664 0.612841 0.061*
C9 0.40861 (12) 0.33048 (16) 0.63217 (13) 0.0608 (4)
H9 0.372408 0.346381 0.566876 0.073*
C10 0.42249 (12) 0.42814 (15) 0.70093 (15) 0.0649 (5)
H10 0.395238 0.510190 0.682456 0.078*
C11 0.47650 (13) 0.40503 (15) 0.79693 (15) 0.0639 (4)
H11 0.486050 0.471484 0.843544 0.077*
C12 0.51698 (11) 0.28257 (14) 0.82473 (11) 0.0508 (3)
H12 0.553878 0.267904 0.889987 0.061*
C13 0.69896 (10) 0.03120 (13) 0.60592 (9) 0.0435 (3)
C14 0.68956 (14) 0.16488 (15) 0.59909 (12) 0.0593 (4)
H14 0.656620 0.209142 0.640704 0.071*
C15 0.72856 (16) 0.23353 (17) 0.53114 (13) 0.0693 (5)
H15 0.722127 0.323421 0.527699 0.083*
C16 0.77685 (15) 0.16916 (19) 0.46859 (13) 0.0695 (5)
H16 0.803555 0.215281 0.423235 0.083*
C17 0.78528 (15) 0.03651 (18) 0.47370 (13) 0.0664 (5)
H17 0.816965 −0.007417 0.430922 0.080*
C18 0.74709 (12) −0.03242 (15) 0.54185 (11) 0.0528 (4)
H18 0.753688 −0.122304 0.544822 0.063*
C19 0.73417 (10) 0.06355 (13) 0.83744 (10) 0.0443 (3)
C20 0.83981 (11) 0.02750 (16) 0.82495 (13) 0.0565 (4)
H20A 0.851320 0.070404 0.767506 0.085*
H20B 0.843344 −0.064779 0.816729 0.085*
H20C 0.892096 0.053889 0.882667 0.085*
C21 0.42650 (12) −0.10889 (15) 0.84920 (12) 0.0546 (4)
H21 0.486985 −0.132684 0.902717 0.065*
C22 0.37021 (14) 0.00100 (17) 0.88713 (14) 0.0665 (5)
H22A 0.313140 0.030351 0.834665 0.100*
H22B 0.417520 0.071598 0.909149 0.100*
H22C 0.344502 −0.029708 0.941477 0.100*
C23 0.35598 (17) −0.22597 (19) 0.82723 (17) 0.0826 (6)
H23A 0.299342 −0.208302 0.770673 0.124*
H23B 0.329279 −0.244610 0.883608 0.124*
H23C 0.394522 −0.299376 0.813439 0.124*
N1 0.64819 (8) 0.02265 (10) 0.76798 (7) 0.0396 (2)
O1 0.72737 (8) 0.12759 (12) 0.90987 (7) 0.0591 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C2 0.0512 (7) 0.0375 (6) 0.0451 (7) 0.0024 (5) 0.0209 (6) −0.0028 (5)
C3 0.0679 (9) 0.0462 (7) 0.0528 (8) −0.0114 (7) 0.0272 (7) −0.0134 (6)
C4 0.0683 (9) 0.0406 (7) 0.0652 (9) −0.0110 (6) 0.0322 (7) −0.0093 (6)
C5 0.0452 (7) 0.0406 (6) 0.0475 (7) −0.0036 (5) 0.0172 (5) −0.0013 (5)
C6 0.0403 (6) 0.0406 (6) 0.0370 (6) −0.0001 (5) 0.0135 (5) −0.0022 (5)
C7 0.0361 (6) 0.0390 (6) 0.0482 (7) −0.0005 (5) 0.0159 (5) −0.0026 (5)
C8 0.0510 (8) 0.0485 (7) 0.0519 (8) 0.0004 (6) 0.0102 (6) 0.0004 (6)
C9 0.0479 (8) 0.0585 (9) 0.0731 (10) 0.0054 (7) 0.0097 (7) 0.0153 (8)
C10 0.0458 (8) 0.0446 (8) 0.1057 (14) 0.0073 (6) 0.0220 (9) 0.0102 (8)
C11 0.0551 (9) 0.0444 (8) 0.0961 (13) 0.0018 (6) 0.0264 (8) −0.0164 (8)
C12 0.0490 (8) 0.0469 (7) 0.0585 (8) −0.0001 (6) 0.0171 (6) −0.0094 (6)
C13 0.0444 (7) 0.0455 (7) 0.0436 (7) −0.0016 (5) 0.0166 (5) −0.0024 (5)
C14 0.0767 (10) 0.0461 (8) 0.0656 (9) 0.0005 (7) 0.0375 (8) 0.0000 (7)
C15 0.0948 (13) 0.0505 (9) 0.0723 (10) −0.0069 (8) 0.0390 (9) 0.0065 (8)
C16 0.0826 (12) 0.0743 (11) 0.0609 (9) −0.0179 (9) 0.0357 (9) 0.0030 (8)
C17 0.0757 (11) 0.0735 (11) 0.0628 (9) −0.0068 (9) 0.0411 (8) −0.0087 (8)
C18 0.0575 (8) 0.0527 (8) 0.0548 (8) 0.0004 (6) 0.0264 (7) −0.0062 (6)
C19 0.0435 (7) 0.0426 (7) 0.0472 (7) 0.0009 (5) 0.0122 (5) 0.0026 (5)
C20 0.0419 (7) 0.0572 (9) 0.0714 (10) 0.0005 (6) 0.0162 (7) 0.0017 (7)
C21 0.0575 (8) 0.0525 (8) 0.0612 (8) −0.0021 (6) 0.0287 (7) 0.0055 (6)
C22 0.0701 (10) 0.0686 (10) 0.0743 (10) −0.0087 (8) 0.0433 (9) −0.0094 (8)
C23 0.0985 (15) 0.0604 (11) 0.1080 (15) −0.0175 (10) 0.0617 (12) −0.0009 (10)
N1 0.0411 (5) 0.0404 (5) 0.0398 (5) 0.0016 (4) 0.0149 (4) −0.0026 (4)
O1 0.0509 (6) 0.0719 (7) 0.0518 (6) −0.0013 (5) 0.0080 (4) −0.0156 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C2—N1 1.4770 (15) C13—C14 1.384 (2)
C2—C13 1.5199 (18) C13—C18 1.3878 (18)
C2—C3 1.522 (2) C14—C15 1.384 (2)
C2—H2 0.9800 C14—H14 0.9300
C3—C4 1.516 (2) C15—C16 1.377 (3)
C3—H3A 0.9700 C15—H15 0.9300
C3—H3B 0.9700 C16—C17 1.371 (3)
C4—C5 1.5238 (19) C16—H16 0.9300
C4—H4A 0.9700 C17—C18 1.381 (2)
C4—H4B 0.9700 C17—H17 0.9300
C5—C21 1.5422 (19) C18—H18 0.9300
C5—C6 1.5561 (18) C19—O1 1.2280 (16)
C5—H5 0.9800 C19—N1 1.3648 (17)
C6—N1 1.4913 (15) C19—C20 1.5061 (19)
C6—C7 1.5241 (17) C20—H20A 0.9600
C6—H6 0.9800 C20—H20B 0.9600
C7—C8 1.3843 (19) C20—H20C 0.9600
C7—C12 1.3897 (18) C21—C23 1.511 (2)
C8—C9 1.390 (2) C21—C22 1.524 (2)
C8—H8 0.9300 C21—H21 0.9800
C9—C10 1.369 (2) C22—H22A 0.9600
C9—H9 0.9300 C22—H22B 0.9600
C10—C11 1.370 (3) C22—H22C 0.9600
C10—H10 0.9300 C23—H23A 0.9600
C11—C12 1.388 (2) C23—H23B 0.9600
C11—H11 0.9300 C23—H23C 0.9600
C12—H12 0.9300
N1—C2—C13 114.24 (10) C14—C13—C18 118.30 (13)
N1—C2—C3 110.44 (10) C14—C13—C2 123.46 (12)
C13—C2—C3 112.10 (11) C18—C13—C2 118.25 (12)
N1—C2—H2 106.5 C15—C14—C13 120.84 (15)
C13—C2—H2 106.5 C15—C14—H14 119.6
C3—C2—H2 106.5 C13—C14—H14 119.6
C4—C3—C2 109.64 (12) C16—C15—C14 120.20 (16)
C4—C3—H3A 109.7 C16—C15—H15 119.9
C2—C3—H3A 109.7 C14—C15—H15 119.9
C4—C3—H3B 109.7 C17—C16—C15 119.48 (15)
C2—C3—H3B 109.7 C17—C16—H16 120.3
H3A—C3—H3B 108.2 C15—C16—H16 120.3
C3—C4—C5 109.13 (11) C16—C17—C18 120.55 (15)
C3—C4—H4A 109.9 C16—C17—H17 119.7
C5—C4—H4A 109.9 C18—C17—H17 119.7
C3—C4—H4B 109.9 C17—C18—C13 120.63 (15)
C5—C4—H4B 109.9 C17—C18—H18 119.7
H4A—C4—H4B 108.3 C13—C18—H18 119.7
C4—C5—C21 113.54 (11) O1—C19—N1 121.72 (12)
C4—C5—C6 111.60 (11) O1—C19—C20 119.50 (13)
C21—C5—C6 110.21 (11) N1—C19—C20 118.78 (12)
C4—C5—H5 107.0 C19—C20—H20A 109.5
C21—C5—H5 107.0 C19—C20—H20B 109.5
C6—C5—H5 107.0 H20A—C20—H20B 109.5
N1—C6—C7 112.27 (10) C19—C20—H20C 109.5
N1—C6—C5 113.89 (10) H20A—C20—H20C 109.5
C7—C6—C5 114.11 (10) H20B—C20—H20C 109.5
N1—C6—H6 105.2 C23—C21—C22 109.18 (14)
C7—C6—H6 105.2 C23—C21—C5 113.34 (13)
C5—C6—H6 105.2 C22—C21—C5 111.18 (13)
C8—C7—C12 117.74 (13) C23—C21—H21 107.6
C8—C7—C6 122.99 (12) C22—C21—H21 107.6
C12—C7—C6 119.25 (12) C5—C21—H21 107.6
C7—C8—C9 121.13 (14) C21—C22—H22A 109.5
C7—C8—H8 119.4 C21—C22—H22B 109.5
C9—C8—H8 119.4 H22A—C22—H22B 109.5
C10—C9—C8 120.00 (15) C21—C22—H22C 109.5
C10—C9—H9 120.0 H22A—C22—H22C 109.5
C8—C9—H9 120.0 H22B—C22—H22C 109.5
C9—C10—C11 120.01 (15) C21—C23—H23A 109.5
C9—C10—H10 120.0 C21—C23—H23B 109.5
C11—C10—H10 120.0 H23A—C23—H23B 109.5
C10—C11—C12 120.09 (15) C21—C23—H23C 109.5
C10—C11—H11 120.0 H23A—C23—H23C 109.5
C12—C11—H11 120.0 H23B—C23—H23C 109.5
C11—C12—C7 121.02 (15) C19—N1—C2 120.44 (11)
C11—C12—H12 119.5 C19—N1—C6 116.00 (10)
C7—C12—H12 119.5 C2—N1—C6 123.43 (10)
N1—C2—C3—C4 −39.81 (16) C18—C13—C14—C15 −1.0 (3)
C13—C2—C3—C4 −168.43 (12) C2—C13—C14—C15 179.32 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C5 72.53 (16) C13—C14—C15—C16 0.5 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C21 −173.93 (13) C14—C15—C16—C17 0.5 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −48.63 (16) C15—C16—C17—C18 −0.9 (3)
C4—C5—C6—N1 −1.38 (15) C16—C17—C18—C13 0.4 (3)
C21—C5—C6—N1 125.74 (12) C14—C13—C18—C17 0.5 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C7 129.33 (12) C2—C13—C18—C17 −179.74 (14)
C21—C5—C6—C7 −103.55 (13) C4—C5—C21—C23 −48.70 (19)
N1—C6—C7—C8 82.58 (15) C6—C5—C21—C23 −174.73 (14)
C5—C6—C7—C8 −48.92 (16) C4—C5—C21—C22 −172.13 (14)
N1—C6—C7—C12 −98.65 (13) C6—C5—C21—C22 61.84 (16)
C5—C6—C7—C12 129.85 (12) O1—C19—N1—C2 177.54 (12)
C12—C7—C8—C9 −0.2 (2) C20—C19—N1—C2 −3.16 (18)
C6—C7—C8—C9 178.56 (13) O1—C19—N1—C6 −6.49 (18)
C7—C8—C9—C10 −0.3 (2) C20—C19—N1—C6 172.81 (11)
C8—C9—C10—C11 0.5 (3) C13—C2—N1—C19 −69.70 (15)
C9—C10—C11—C12 −0.2 (2) C3—C2—N1—C19 162.84 (12)
C10—C11—C12—C7 −0.4 (2) C13—C2—N1—C6 114.64 (13)
C8—C7—C12—C11 0.6 (2) C3—C2—N1—C6 −12.81 (17)
C6—C7—C12—C11 −178.28 (13) C7—C6—N1—C19 87.19 (13)
N1—C2—C13—C14 −23.54 (19) C5—C6—N1—C19 −141.19 (11)
C3—C2—C13—C14 103.05 (16) C7—C6—N1—C2 −96.97 (13)
N1—C2—C13—C18 156.75 (12) C5—C6—N1—C2 34.64 (15)
C3—C2—C13—C18 −76.66 (16)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C9—H9···O1i 0.93 2.54 3.4378 (19) 163

Symmetry code: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by University Grants Commission grant .

References

  1. Allen, F. H., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Allen, F. H., Raithby, P. R., Shields, G. P. & Taylor, R. (1998). Chem. Commun. pp. 1043–1044.
  2. Aridoss, G., Parthiban, P., Ramachandran, R., Prakash, M., Kabilan, S. & Jeong, Y. T. (2009). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44, 577–592. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Badorrey, R., Cativiela, C., Díaz-de-Villegas, M. D. & Gálvez, J. A. (1999). Tetrahedron, 55, 7601–7612.
  4. Becke, A. (1993). J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652.
  5. Beddoes, R. L., Dalton, L., Joule, T. A., Mills, O. S., Street, J. D. & Watt, C. I. F. (1986). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 787–797.
  6. Bruker (2008). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  7. Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.
  8. Fleming, I. (1976). Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions. London: Wiley.
  9. Frisch, M. J., , et al. (2009). GAUSSIAN09. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA.
  10. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Hathwar, V. R., Sist, M., Jørgensen, M. R. V., Mamakhel, A. H., Wang, X., Hoffmann, C. M., Sugimoto, K., Overgaard, J. & Iversen, B. B. (2015). IUCrJ, 2, 563–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Koenderink, J. J. (1990). Solid Shape. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  13. Koenderink, J. J. & van Doorn, A. J. (1992). Image Vis. Comput. 10, 557–564.
  14. Macrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Maheshwaran, V., Abdul Basheer, S., Akila, A., Ponnuswamy, S. & Ponnuswamy, M. N. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. pp. 3814–3816. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Mobio, I. G., Soldatenkov, A. T., Federov, V. O., Ageev, E. A., Sergeeva, N. D., Lin, S., Stashenku, E. E., Prostakov, N. S. & Andreeva, E. L. (1989). Khim. Farm. Zh. 23, 421–427.
  18. Mohamooda Sumaya, U., Sankar, E., Arasambattu MohanaKrishnan, K., Biruntha, K. & Usha, G. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 878–883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Ravindran, T. & Jeyaraman, R. (1992). Indian J. Chem. B31, 677–682.
  20. Sampath, N., Aravindhan, S., Ponnuswamy, M. N. & Nethaji, M. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o2105–o2106.
  21. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  23. Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 19–32.
  24. Spek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  25. Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17. University of Western Australia. http://hirshfeldsurface.net.
  26. Venkatesan, P., Thamotharan, S., Ilangovan, A., Liang, H. & Sundius, T. (2016). Spectrochim. Acta, A153, 625–636. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Wagstaff, A. J., Cheer, S. M., Matheson, A. J., Ormrod, D. & Goa, K. L. (2002). Drugs, 62, 655–703. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020002042/dx2023sup1.cif

e-76-00377-sup1.cif (1.3MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020002042/dx2023Isup2.hkl

e-76-00377-Isup2.hkl (417.5KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020002042/dx2023Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1814839

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES