Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;21:96. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3419-8

Table 2.

Robustness of barcode error correction, measured through simulated data

Edit distance Positive (%) Negative (%)
1 True 99.999 67.281
False 0.001 32.721
2 True 99.983 74.971
False 0.017 25.033
3 True 99.710. 77.972
False 0.290. 22.033

The barcodes of 400,000 simulated duplex reads were corrected with Du Novo 2.15 with three different edit distance thresholds: 1, 2, and 3. Corrected and uncorrected barcodes were compared to the original, true barcode sequences. For each corrected barcode, if the correction assigned it to its true family, this was counted as a true positive. Otherwise it was a false positive. Uncorrected barcodes which were not one of the original, true barcodes were counted as false negatives. The rest of the uncorrected barcodes were counted as true negatives. Each family was counted once, rather than each raw read