. 2020 Feb 21;5(8):4242–4249. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04155

Table 1. Tomato Yield with Every Single Harvest and Total Yield Under Different Amounts of SES^a.

treatment	first harvest (kg greenhouse^–1)	second harvest	third harvest	fourth harvest	fifth harvest	sixth harvest	total yield	total yield increment vs CK (%)
CK	506.4^c	1036.7^c	1435.8^ab	1654.1^a	1194.7^a	664.8^a	6492.6^b
SES30	922.4^b	1491.3^b	1528.4^a	1303.2^b	1037.8^b	506.8^b	6789.9^a	4.6
SES60	1036.0^b	1658.5^a	1488.4^a	1264.2^b	1025.0^b	466.0^b	6938.0^a	6.9
SES90	1172.7^a	1740.1^a	1326.3^b	1199.2^b	905.5^b	456.4^b	6800.2^a	4.7

Mean values followed by the same lowercase letter were not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level based on one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests within the same column.

Table 1. Tomato Yield with Every Single Harvest and Total Yield Under Different Amounts of SESa.

Table 1. Tomato Yield with Every Single Harvest and Total Yield Under Different Amounts of SES^a.