. 2020 Feb 21;5(8):4242–4249. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04155

Table 5. Tomato Quality Under Different Amounts of SES^a.

treatment	single weight (g)	hardness (kg cm^–2)	soluble solids (%, FW)	titratable acid (%, FW)	soluble sugar (%, FW)	sugar acid ratio	vitamin C content (mg g^–1)
CK	211.2^a	4.20^c	4.90^a	0.33^a	3.09^b	9.36^b	2.92^a
SES30	214.7^a	4.37b^c	5.00^a	0.34^a	3.40^a	10.00^a	3.20^a
SES60	219.0^a	4.63^b	5.37^a	0.35^a	3.59^a	10.26^a	2.76^a
SES90	217.3^a	5.03^a	5.07^a	0.35^a	3.51^a	10.03^a	2.88^a

Mean values followed by the same lowercase letter were not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level based on one-way ANOVAs followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests within the same column. FW, fresh weight.

Table 5. Tomato Quality Under Different Amounts of SESa.

Table 5. Tomato Quality Under Different Amounts of SES^a.