Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa.
| entry | catalyst | Ag salt | Cu salt | solvent | yield (%) of 3a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Cp*IrCl2] 2 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 35 |
| 2 | [Cp*RhCl2] 2 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 41 |
| 3 | (PPh3)3RuCl2 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | trace |
| 4 | RuCl3 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | NRb |
| 5 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 45 |
| 6 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgPF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 26 |
| 7 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgBF4 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 29 |
| 8 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgOTf | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 30 |
| 9 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgOAc | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 35 |
| 10 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | Ag2CO3 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 37 |
| 11 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | CuCO3 | DCE | 40 |
| 12 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | CuBr2 | DCE | 36 |
| 13 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | CuO | DCE | 39 |
| 14 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCM | 40 |
| 15 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | PhMe | 31 |
| 16 | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | MeOH | trace |
| 17c | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | 66 |
| 18d | AgSbF6 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | NRb | |
| 19e | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | Cu(OAc)2·H2O | DCE | NRb | |
| 20f | [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 | AgSbF6 | DCE | 52 |
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv), catalyst (2.5 mol %), silver salt (10 mol %), and copper salt (20 mol %) in 3 mL solvent at 100 °C for 12 h.
No reaction.
3.5 mol % [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 in combination of 30 mol % AgSbF6 were used. Reaction time was extended to 21 h.
No Ru catalyst was used.
No silver salt was used.
No copper salt was used, while 3.5 mol % [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 in combination of 30 mol % AgSbF6 were used for 21 h.
