Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;11(8):2277–2301. doi: 10.1039/c9sc04090k

Fig. 13. Binomial GLM models of proportion of original submissions rejected without peer review. (a) – Binomial GLM model of proportion of original submissions rejected without peer review, corresponding author gender and editor gender (Model: RejectedWithoutPeerReview ∼ CorrAuthorGender * EditorGender). ANOVA Pr(>Chi): CorrAuthorGender is highly significant (1.71 × 10–20); EditorGender is highly significant (8.98 × 10–79); CorrespondingAuthorGender: EditorGender is not significant (0.76). (b) – Binomial GLM model of proportion of original submissions rejected without peer review, corresponding author gender and journal editorial model (Model: RejectedWithoutPeerReview ∼ CorrAuthorGender * EditorialModelOfJournal). ANOVA Pr(>Chi): CorrAuthorGender is highly significant (6.18 × 10–41); EditorialModelOfJournal is highly significant (0.00); CorrAuthorGender: EditorialModelOfJournal is highly significant (3.07 × 10–4).

Fig. 13