Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;11(8):2277–2301. doi: 10.1039/c9sc04090k

Fig. 14. Binomial GLM model of proportion of reviews. (a) – Binomial GLM model of proportion of review invitations by female reviewers, corresponding author gender and reviewer response (Model: ReviewerGender ∼ CorrAuthorGender * Response). ANOVA Pr(>Chi): CorrAuthorGender is highly significant (1.77 × 10–161); Response is highly significant (2.13 × 10–28); CorrAuthorGender: Response is highly significant (3.08 × 10–8). (b) – Binomial GLM model of proportion of reviews by female reviewers, corresponding author gender and editor gender (Model: ReviewerGender ∼ CorrAuthorGender * EditorGender). ANOVA Pr(>Chi): CorrAuthorGender is highly significant (1.64 × 10–64); EditorGender is highly significant (1.86 × 10–46); CorrAuthorGender: EditorGender is significant (9.04 × 10–3).

Fig. 14