Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;23(4):660–673. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003495

Table 3.

Dominance analysis results: explanatory power of each factor to screening positive for depression among women of reproductive age (n 2599) participating in the Food and Agricultural Approaches to Reducing Malnutrition (FAARM) trial in rural north-eastern Bangladesh, 2015

Contributing variable Non-peripartum women
(n 1440)*
Overall fit statistic (pseudo R2) = 0·2654
Peripartum women
(n 1040)*
Overall fit statistic (pseudo R2) = 0·2898
Rank Relative contribution to overall fit Rank Relative contribution to overall fit
Cluster 1 0·0747 1 0·0797
Interviewer 2 0·0708 2 0·0748
Household food insecurity (HFIAS) 3 0·0480 3 0·0599
Household food consumption (FCS) 4 0·0165 5 0·0110
Social support 5 0·0087 4 0·0146
Low dietary diversity (<5/13 groups) 6 0·0070 6 0·0099
Age 7 0·0070 13 0·0042
Mobility 8 0·0066 11 0·0046
Age at first marriage 9 0·0065 8 0·0063
Wealth quintile 10 0·0043 10 0·0048
CED (BMI < 18·5 kg/m2) 11 0·0031 not used for peripartum women
Live births 12 0·0031 12 0·0045
Interpersonal communication 13 0·0023 15 0·0007
Religion 14 0·0023 7 0·0065
Education 15 0·0021 9 0·0050
Household size 16 0·0015 14 0·0027
Decision-making capacity 17 0·0009 16 0·0006
Anaemia 18 0·0001 not used for peripartum women

HFIAS, Household Food Insecurity and Access Scale; FCS, Food Consumption Score; CED, chronic energy deficiency.

*

Missing values. NPW: ninety-three observations dropped due to missing values for anaemia; two observations dropped due to missing dietary diversity values; nine observations dropped due to missing BMI. PW: three observations dropped due to missing time since birth information.