Figure 5.

Relationship between context‐dependent connectivity and cognition. The graphs plot aberrant features of distraction and memory‐load dependent connectivity for encoding and retrieval phases and their correlations with visuospatial working memory (left columns) and neuropsychological test performances (right columns). Graphs are displayed for PD (top two rows) and control (bottom row) participants. Standardized residuals (sex adjusted) are plotted for all variables. Higher K values signify greater working memory capacity. More negative d′ values indicate less distraction resistance. More negative RTs indicate better distraction resistance. BVFD, Benton Form Discrimination test; CVLT, California Verbal Learning test (short delayed recall); HVO, Hooper Visual Organization test; L/R, left and right hemisphere; Caud, caudate; DPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; Ling, lingual gyrus; mdThal, mediodorsal thalamus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus (BA 6); MTG, middle temporal gyrus; preSMA, presupplementary motor area; PCG, posterior cingulate gyrus; Precun, precuneus; Put, putamen; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; Thal, thalamus