Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 8;59(2):825–833. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-02091-5

Table 2.

Baseline semen quality (mean ± SD) of men randomized to receive lactolycopene or placebo

All
n = 56
Placebo
n = 28
Lactolycopene
n = 28
p
(a) Semen quality
Abstinence (d)a 3.2 ± 0.82 3.1 ± 0.54 3.3 ± 1.02 0.248
Semen volume 4.1 ± 1.66 4.0 ± 1.57 4.2 ± 1.77 0.635
Sperm concentration (× 106/ml)a 63.4 ± 50.79 56.8 ± 43.24 70.0 ± 57.40 0.523
Percent motility (%) 61.1 ± 23.78 62.8 ± 22.69 59.4 ± 25.13 0.597
Fast progressive (%) 11.2 ± 7.76 11.8 ± 6.96 10.6 ± 8.57 0.551
Slow progressive (%) 24.9 ± 14.51 26.3 ± 14.74 23.5 ± 14.40 0.474
Non-progressive (%) 25.0 ± 7.63 24.6 ± 6.67 25.3 ± 8.58 0.752
Immotile (%) 38.9 ± 23.79 37.2 ± 22.68 40.6 ± 25.14 0.598
Motile sperm concentration (× 106/ml)b 27.0 ± 31.03 26.2 ± 31.68 27.8 ± 30.93 0.597
Sperm with normal morphology (%)a 8.3 ± 5.40 9.1 ± 5.28 7.5 ± 5.48 0.144
DNA damage (%)a 1.5 ± 1.56 1.4 ± 1.65 1.6 ± 1.48 0.366
(b) Clinical classificationc
Normozoospermic (n) 25 14 11 0.420
Other (n) 31 14 17

p: independent sample t test or aNon-parametric Mann–Whitney U for continuous variables

bExpressed as the concentration of fast-progressive and slow-progressive sperm

cPearson chi squared