Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;59(2):755–766. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-01942-5

Table 2.

Cognitive function of post-menopausal women at baseline and following 12 weeks’ soy drink intervention

Treatment group Low (n = 35) Medium (n = 37) High (n = 29)
Cognitive test Baseline Week 12 Change from baseline Baseline Week 12 Change from baseline Baseline Week 12 Change from baseline
RTI 373.66 ± 51.83a 367.06 ± 59.34 − 6.60 ± 55.11 345 ± 45.66 354.15 ± 67 9.15 ± 55.07 349.33 ± 61.70 363.99 ± 70.79 14.66 ± 52.64
SSP 5.51 ± 1.06 5.77 ± 1.14 0.25 ± 1.22 5.65 ± 1.18 5.68 ± 1.23 0.03 ± 1.55 5.62 ± 1.18 5.76 ± 0.83 0.14 ± 1.36
SWM 33.86 ± 19.09 29.11 ± 16.95 − 4.74 ± 15.74 28.7 ± 17.59 28.92 ± 17.85 0.22 ± 17.42 30.45 ± 16.04 27.90 ± 16.08 − 2.55 ± 15.07
PRM 2054.25 ± 395.87 2083.14 ± 544.32 28.89 ± 417.47 2138.94 ± 587.38 1903.244 ± 434.09 − 235.7 ± 557.83 1920.65 ± 458.59 1969.56 ± 568.19 48.91 ± 565.60
MTS 2836.70 ± 732.05 2518.54 ± 735.28 − 318.16 ± 585.35 2846.98 ± 796.82 2456.46 ± 606.2 − 390.52 ± 814.11 2694.54 ± 597.66 2535.90 ± 607.23 − 158.64 ± 572.23

No significant differences were observed between the groups for any of the outcomes measured using an ANCOVA to compare post-intervention (week 12) cognitive function with baseline measures as covariates

RTI five-choice reaction time measured as reaction time latency (ms), SSP spatial span measured as longest sequence length recalled correctly, SWM spatial working memory measured as total errors made, PRM pattern recognition memory measured as mean correct latency (ms), MTS match to sample visual search measured as mean correct reaction time (ms)

aMean ± SD (all such values)