TABLE 1.
RP841F/Reg1302R (Kittelmann et al., 2015) |
P-SSU-316F/GIC758R (Ishaq and Wright, 2014) |
GIC1080F/GIC1578R (Ishaq and Wright, 2014) |
P-SSU-54F/P-SSU-1747R (Sylvester et al., 2004) |
P.324f/P.1747r_2 (Zhang et al., 2015) |
|||||||||||
Genus targeted | Eligible target sequences2 | Coverage (%)3 | Specificity (%)4 | Eligible target sequences | Coverage (%) | Specificity (%) | Eligible target sequences | Coverage (%) | Specificity (%) | Eligible target sequences | Coverage (%) | Specificity (%) | Eligible target sequences | Coverage (%) | Specificity (%) |
Charonina | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 50.0 | 100 | 3 | 33.3 | 99.9 | 2 | 100 | 99.9 | 3 | 33.3 | 100 |
Dasytricha | 22 | 72.7 | 99.9 | 12 | 100 | 100 | 20 | 75.0 | 99.9 | 5 | 100 | 99.9 | 16 | 37.5 | 100 |
Diplodinium | 34 | 100 | 99.9 | 17 | 88.2 | 100 | 33 | 54.5 | 99.9 | 15 | 100 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Diploplastron | 2 | 100 | 99.9 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 99.9 | 1 | 100 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Enoploplastron | 1 | 100 | 99.9 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 99.9 | 1 | 100 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Entodinium | 201 | 89.1 | 100 | 38 | 92.1 | 100 | 196 | 80.1 | 99.9 | 16 | 100 | 99.9 | 175 | 20.0 | 100 |
Eodinium | 3 | 100 | 99.9 | 3 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | NA |
Epidinium | 3 | 100 | 99.9 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 3 | 100 | 99.9 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Eremoplastron | 5 | 40.0 | 99.9 | 5 | 80.0 | 100 | 5 | 80.0 | 99.9 | 4 | 75.0 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Eudiplodinium | 36 | 100 | 99.9 | 34 | 100 | 100 | 36 | 33.3 | 99.9 | 33 | 97.0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Isotricha | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100 | 100 | 8 | 75.0 | 99.9 | 6 | 100 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Metadinium | 6 | 100 | 99.9 | 4 | 100 | 100 | 6 | 66.7 | 99.9 | 4 | 100 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Ophryoscolex | 43 | 93.0 | 99.9 | 31 | 96.8 | 100 | 43 | 41.9 | 99.9 | 30 | 100 | 100 | 46 | 2.2 | 100 |
Ostracodinium | 5 | 100 | 99.9 | 3 | 100 | 100 | 5 | 100 | 99.9 | 3 | 100 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA |
Polyplastron | 27 | 88.9 | 99.9 | 21 | 90.5 | 100 | 27 | 22.2 | 99.9 | 20 | 95.0 | 99.9 | 30 | 6.7 | 100 |
uncultured | 17 | 94.1 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA | 17 | 94.1 | 99.9 | 0 | 0 | NA | 17 | 64.7 | 100 |
Total | 416 | 88.25 | 99.9 | 180 | 94.4 | 100 | 405 | 66.2 | 99.9 | 142 | 97.9 | 99.9 | 287 | 19.5 | 100 |
1TestPrime 1.0 was used to evaluate the primer pairs (Klindworth et al., 2013).2Eligible target seqs = number of target sequences with corresponding regions of the primer pairs.3Coverage (%) = (number of sequences matched/number of eligible target sequences) × 100. Total coverage mean (bottom row of data) among all genera is weighted for the numbers of sequences within each genus.4Specificity (%) = 100 - (outgroup matched sequences/outgroup matchable sequences) × 100. NA = not available because it could be calculated only when at least one sequence was matched. NA values were excluded from the total mean.5With one mismatch allowed (and not compromising specificity), coverage of this primer pair equals 95.9%.