Table 1.
Full model of the nutritional effects on (A) diet consumption and (B) fitness. We include results from the parametric bootstrap model comparison, including the value of the test statistic (the log-likelihood ratio, LLR), degrees of freedom, p-value and percentage of the overall variance explained by each model, as well as the percentage of variance attributable to mitochondrial and diet-specific mitochondrial effects (Δ variance).
| A. diet consumption | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | df | resid. df | p-value | ||
| (intercept) | 187.074 | 1 | 1.68 | 0.0102 | |
| diet | 18.482 | 3 | 356.16 | >0.001 | |
|
model comparison | |||||
| LLR | df | p-value | variance | Δ variance | |
| base model | 19.21% | – | |||
| mito | 2.461 | 1 | 0.04811 | 20.59% | 1.38% |
| diet-specific mito | 15.941 | 9 | 0.00101 | 24.83% | 4.24% |
| B. fitness | |||||
| F | df | Resid. df | p-value | ||
| (intercept) | 58.5258 | 1 | 4.27 | 0.0011 | |
| protein | 6.5259 | 1 | 357.46 | 0.01104 | |
| carbohydrate | 4.6687 | 1 | 354.85 | 0.0313 | |
| protein2 | 6.8662 | 1 | 355.42 | 0.0091 | |
| carbohydrate2 | 2.9447 | 1 | 352.75 | 0.0870 | |
| protein × carbohydrate | 0.0865 | 1 | 356.07 | 0.7688 | |
|
model comparison | |||||
| LLR | df | p-value | variance | Δ variance | |
| base model | 16.62% | – | |||
| mito | 9.8427 | 1 | 0.0018 | 20.29% | 3.67% |
| diet-specific mito | 9.7451 | 14 | 0.0495 | 26.40% | 6.11% |