Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 20;22(2):e14122. doi: 10.2196/14122

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of patients with gastric cancer.



Variable
Univariate survival analysis Multivariate analysisa

Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Concordance (no/yes) 0.312 (0.187-0.521) <.001 0.374 (0.220-0.634) <.001
Age (<70/≥70 years) 1.265 (0.771-2.075) .35 b
Gender (male/female) 1.191 (0.730-1.943) .48
ECOGc PSd




1 0.719 (0.286-1.805) .48

2 1.092 (0.400-2.983) .86

3 (reference) .31
NRSe 2002 PS (<3/≥3) 1.231 (0.752-2.018) .41
Differentiation type (well, moderate/poor) 1.769 (0.878-3.563) .11 1.166 (0.571-2.380) .67
HER2f status (negative/positive) 1.681 (0.903-3.131) .10 0.986 (0.517-1.881) .97
cStageg




I 0.000 (0.000-5.030) .97 0.000 (0.001-9.960) .97

II 0.066 (0.009-0.481) .01 0.087 (0.012-0.638) .02

III 0.400 (0.248-0.646) <.001 0.417 (0.256-0.678) <.001


Ⅳ (reference) <.001 .001

aMultivariate model included concordance, differentiation type, HER2 status, and clinical stage. Enter model selection was performed.

bNot applicable.

cECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

dPS: performance status.

eNRS: nutrition risk screening.

fHER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

gcStage: clinical stage; TNM-8, the Union for International Cancer Control 8th edition and American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition.