Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb;179:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.09.010

Table 3.

Extent of misclassification on using different MUAC cutoffs as against the corresponding BMI cutoffs. Women's nutrition study, Bihar, 2016.

Body mass index (kg/m2) Mid-upper arm circumference (cm) Sensitivity and specificity of the chosen cutoff value Total misclassification (%) Kappa coefficient (95% CI)
<23.2
≥23.2
<18.5 193 (31.23) 53 (8.58) 0.89, 0.82 18.94 0.68 (0.62–0.73)
≥18.5 64 (10.36)
308 (49.84)
<26
≥26
<23 494 (79.94) 59 (9.55) 0.91, 0.91 11.33 0.61 (0.53–0.69)
≥23 11 (1.78)
54 (8.74)
<27.3
≥27.3
<25 565 (91.42) 24 (3.88) 0.95, 0.94 4.85 0.60 (0.48–0.72)
≥25 6 (0.97)
23 (3.72)
<30.5
≥30.5
<30 608 (98.38) 4 (0.65) 0.99, 0.83 0.97 0.58 (0.30–0.86)
≥30 2 (0.32) 4 (0.65)

MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval.