Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2020 Jan 21;30(3):932–946.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.062

Figure 6. PIEZO2LOF iSNs Are Insensitive to Mechanical Stimuli.

Figure 6.

(A) Representative immunocytochemistry from at least three differentiations of control and patient iSNs. Scale bar, 50 μm.

(B) qRT-PCR of sensory-related genes in day 21 iSNs, normalized to the housekeeping gene RPLP0 and expressed as −ΔCt for color coding. Each column represents an independent sample, three samples per cell line. Human DRG (hDRG) total RNA was used as a positive control, and WTC11 iPSCs were used as a negative control. Text color denotes gene category: orange, pluripotency; magenta, pan-sensory; purple, LTMR; blue, proprioceptor; green, nociceptor and/or thermoreceptor.

(C) Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings of iSNs during mechanical stimulation. Traces are examples from n = 10 neurons for each cell line.

(D) Quantification of mechanically activated current peak amplitudes in n = 10 cells per cell line. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Post hoc comparisons with Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

(E) Scatter dot plot for peak ΔF/F0 of individual cells after exposure to 500 μM menthol, normalized to KCl response. For each cell line, ≥80 cells were analyzed. In post hoc comparisons between each sample with one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons, no comparison was significantly different (p > 0.05).

See also Figures S4S7 and Table S2.