Table 4.
Feed intake, fecal output, fecal score, fecal pH, urine pH, and apparent total tract macronutrient and energy digestibility
| Canola oil | P-value | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | 0% | 2% | 4% | 6% | SEM | Treatment | Linear | Quadratic | Cubic |
| Intake | |||||||||
| Feed intake (as fed), g/d | 547.50a | 479.33b | 440.70b,c | 388.23c | 28.54 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.726 | 0.666 |
| Feed intake, g DM/d | 121.54 | 119.35 | 109.73 | 103.66 | 6.89 | 0.097 | 0.017 | 0.721 | 0.653 |
| GE intake, kcal/d | 737.54 | 759.28 | 712.02 | 695.03 | 43.73 | 0.566 | 0.263 | 0.574 | 0.520 |
| Output | |||||||||
| Fecal output, g as-is/d | 60.38a | 52.78a,b | 43.25b,c | 35.53c | 6.33 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.987 | 0.833 |
| Fecal output, g DM/d | 19.89a | 18.08a,b | 14.81b,c | 13.55c | 1.78 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.812 | 0.513 |
| Fecal score1 | 2.42 | 2.48 | 2.33 | 2.30 | 0.10 | 0.429 | 0.192 | 0.589 | 0.393 |
| Fecal pH | 6.83 | 6.93 | 6.93 | 6.80 | 0.10 | 0.629 | 0.846 | 0.206 | 0.915 |
| Urine pH | 7.00 | ND | ND | 7.25 | 0.35 | 0.194 | ND | ND | ND |
| Apparent digestibility | |||||||||
| DM, % | 83.61c | 84.69b,c | 86.55a,b | 87.62a | 1.05 | 0.021 | 0.002 | 0.998 | 0.694 |
| OM, % | 88.48c | 89.35b,c | 90.50a | 91.40a | 0.76 | 0.019 | 0.002 | 0.983 | 0.852 |
| CP, % | 89.73 | 89.38 | 89.93 | 90.22 | 0.99 | 0.891 | 0.567 | 0.691 | 0.741 |
| Fat, % | 95.57c | 96.02b,c | 96.84a,b | 97.62a | 0.43 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.613 | 0.788 |
| GE, % | 90.53c | 91.43b,c | 95.01a | 93.35a,b | 0.79 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.118 | 0.036 |
1 Fecal score determined with the use of the Waltham Faeces Scoring System.
a-c Means within a row lacking a common superscript letter are different (P < 0.05).