Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Cancer Sci Ther. 2019 Apr 8;11(4):97.

Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy of Human Cancers

Andrea Brown 1, Sanjay Kumar 1, Paul B Tchounwou 1,*
PMCID: PMC7059781  NIHMSID: NIHMS1032734  PMID: 32148661

Abstract

Cisplatin (cis-diammine-dichloro-platinum II) was initially discovered to prevent the growth of Escherichia coli and was further recognized for its anti-neoplastic and cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. Administered intravenously to humans, cisplatin is used as first-line chemotherapy treatment for patients diagnosed with various types of malignancies, such as leukemia, lymphomas, breast, testicular, ovarian, head and neck, and cervical cancers, and sarcomas. Once cisplatin enters the cell it exerts its cytotoxic effect by losing one chloride ligand, binding to DNA to form intra-strand DNA adducts, and inhibiting DNA synthesis and cell growth. The DNA lesions formed from cisplatin-induced DNA damage activate DNA repair response via NER (nuclear excision repair system) by halting cisplatin-induced cell death by activation of ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) pathway. Although treatment has been shown to be effective, many patients experience relapse due to drug resistance. As a result, other platinum compounds such as oxaliplatin and carboplatin have since been used and have shown some levels of effectiveness. In this review, the clinical applications of cisplatin are discussed with a special emphasis on its use in cancer chemotherapy.

Keywords: Cisplatin, Platinum-based dugs, Cancer chemotherapy, Human cancers

Introduction

Cisplatin (Cis-diammine-dichloro-platinum II) is an organometallic platinum compound that has two adjacent chlorine and amine atoms (Figure 1). Its anti-bacterial effects were first elucidated based on its inhibitory action on the growth of Escherichia coli. It was later discovered that cisplatin had potent anti-neoplastic effects on tumor cells [1]. Its clinical uses during the 1980s proved to be a breakthrough discovery in the establishment of successful cancer treatment drugs. Cisplatin, and other platinum-based compounds such as oxaliplatin, and carboplatin are still being used as first-line treatments for patients who have been diagnosed with various types of malignancies, such as lymphomas, breast, testicular, ovarian, head and neck, cervical, and sarcomas [1]. Seemingly, in the 1990s the rate of platinum-compound drug development was reduced. However, cisplatin and carboplatin remained the most stable and popular of platinum drugs in use. Although many other platinum analogues were tested in clinical studies, only cisplatin and carboplatin showed great benefits.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Molecular structure of cisplatin: This platinum compound is centered around two adjacent chloride ligands (on the left) and two amine groups (on the right).

The cytotoxic mechanism of cisplatin is initiated by its interaction with DNA to form adducts; leading to apoptosis or programmed cell death [2]. Cisplatin was the first implementation of platinum-based chemotherapy introduced by Michele Peyrone in 1845 [3] and further tested in 1968 against multiple bacteria. The antineoplastic drug was administered intra-peritoneally to mice with traits of normal transplantable tumors such as sarcoma-180, at the dosage of 8 mg/kg; and surprisingly was found to be effective at marked tumor reversal [4]. In addition, due to the validity and reliability from in vivo tests conducted in the United Kingdom at the Chester Beatty Institute in London, cisplatin was further tested in clinical trials by the National Cancer Institute in the United States. In 1971, the initial implementation of cisplatin chemotherapy of cancer patients was done, and it was further approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1978 [5]. Despite the success of cisplatin, the development of new platinum compounds represents a major focus intended to make cisplatin-based chemotherapy much safer for patients by minimizing adverse effects, nephrotoxicity, reoccurrence, and resistance [5].

Although many patients being administered cisplatin initially show a good reaction to its chemotherapy, some of them eventually relapse and develop resistance; leading to the reduction in its clinical usefulness. Evidence from tissue culture studies reveals that drug resistance may stem from epigenetic modifications at both cellular and molecular levels; including high levels of DNA damage repair (DDR), modifications in DNA methylation progress, uprooted and low regulation of mRNA expression levels, impairment in transcriptional regulation, and interference with apoptosis [6]. In the review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the medical applications of cisplatin in cancer chemotherapy.

Molecular Mechanisms of Cisplatin Cytotoxicity

Once cisplatin enters the cell it exerts its cytotoxic effect by losing one chloride ligand, binding to DNA to form intra-strand DNA adducts, and inhibiting DNA synthesis and cell growth. The DNA lesions formed from cisplatin-induced DNA damage activate DNA repair response via NER (nuclear excision repair system) by halting cisplatin-induced cell death by activation of ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) pathway [7]. However, because cisplatin-induced DNA damage activate several signal transduction pathways that can facilitate or prevent apoptosis, studies have shown gene p53 is also associated in DNA damage and repair [811]. Moreover, once ATM is activated it maintains and phosphorylates tumor suppressor gene p53 which may induce transactivation of several genes inclusing p21 gene responsible for cell cycle growth arrest, DNA damage inducible gene 45 (GADD45) involved in DNA repair, and Bax to facilitate in apoptosis [12]. Subsequently, to aid in cisplatin-mediated apoptosis gene p53 has been shown to bind directly to Bax-xL to negate its anti-apoptotic activity [13] which decreases the effectiveness of FLICE-like inhibitory protein (FLIP) needed for p53 to activate cisplatin-mediated apoptosis [13,14]. Furthermore, the intra-strand lesions caused by cisplatin-induced DNA crosslinks activate the MMR, or mismatch repair system which promotes the activation of tyrosine kinase c-Abl in response to stress from DNA-damaging agents [15]. Upon activation of c-Abl, extracellular signals that maintain cell growth and sustenance such as JNK, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) are activated to sustain tumor protein p73 resulting in programmed cell death [16]. Figure 2 provides an illustration of the cytotoxic mechanisms of cisplatin chemotherapy inside the cell membrane.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Overview of molecular mechanisms of cisplatin cytotoxicity: Cisplatin enters into cancer cells and interacts with DNA to form DNA adducts. It regulates protein kinase (ATM) and activates p53 leading to a series of signaling cascade and apoptosis in cancer cells.

Cisplatin and ovarian cancer

Eighty percent of patients who have ovarian cancer react to their first cell reduction surgery, superseded with some type of chemotherapy; with a combination of chemotherapeutic drugs cisplatin and paclitaxel or carboplatin and paclitaxel [1719]. Consequently, 70% of patients who receive this type of treatment are at a disadvantage of ovarian cancer returning; with a higher percentage rate among patients with advanced levels of ovarian cancer [1719]. Presently, cisplatin is one of the most powerful chemotherapeutic drugs used for the treatment of ovarian cancer; even though resistance is typical [20]. In ovarian germ cell cancer, the use of cisplatin brings about high response rates [21]. Since the malignancy in the ovaries is the most lethal of all gynecological cancers, knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer is vital for the continuation of useful treatment and strategies to halt chemo-resistance [22].

Cisplatin and testicular cancer

Testicular cancer, or malignant tumors that initiate in the testicles are most commonly found in men between ages 20–40 [23]. Treatment of testicular cancer by cisplatin and other platinum-based compounds has led to scientific breakthroughs, thus increasing the patients’ survival rate [24,25]. In contrast, many patients experience reoccurrence to such cancer due to platinum refusal; inducing late effects of palliative care forfeiting enhancement of life succeeding treatment. Since the mid-1970’s, when platinum-based, antineoplastic drugs, were first introduced, cisplatin-based chemotherapy has produced high endurance in testicular cancer (TC) patients, and likewise in patients with pervasive spread of the disease [26,27]. Dismally, not all testicular cancer patients achieve a complete cure; a portion of patients with pervasive malignancy do not attain lasting remission following their first treatment and later succumb to the disease [28].

Cisplatin and head and neck cancer

Head and neck cancer (HNC) refers to malignant tumors stemming in the topmost aero-digestive tract; which include the lips, mouth, tongue, nose, throat, vocal cords, and part of the esophagus and windpipe [29]. HNC is ranked number eight among the most frequent types of cancers globally; with an incidence rate of more than 500,000 cases each year [30]. Interestingly, over 90% of head and neck tumors are classified as squamous cell carcinoma (or uncontrolled growth or malignant cells initiating in the epidermis) [29]. Undesirably, nearly 50% of these types of cancer are already at the progressive stage at the time of examination; and as a result, have to be treated using a number of approaches (i.e. radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery) in order to preserve organs. Cisplatin is used as a first-line operative chemo-radiation therapy of HNC; usually being administered before or after surgery [31]. The most prevalent treatment regimen is called the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG) schedule; where cisplatin is administered in 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, 43 respectively, in consolidation with traditional radiotherapy [32]. By preference under the RTOG schedule, cisplatin can also be administered at 40 mg/m2 along with traditional or increased radiotherapy [3335]. In addition, cisplatin in combination with known chemotherapeutic drugs docetaxel and fluorouracil have been deemed to have the highest effectiveness for induction treatment as compared to the combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil when treating locally advanced head and neck cancer [36,37].

Cisplatin and esophageal cancer

Cisplatin is among the most efficient and extensively used anti-neoplastic agents clinically for treating patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer [38]. Esophageal cancer is ranked number nine among the most prevalent types of cancer and number six in mortality rates among all malignancies, globally; with greater than 80 % of all cases and deaths stemming from evolving nations [39]. Although removing part of or the whole esophagus is the first-line treatment in non-advanced stages; higher than 50% of patients are subject to cancer metastasis. Hence, chemotherapy is integral for palliative care [40,41]. Drug combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil has been used as a basic antidote for esophageal cancer patients as well as for those experiencing reoccurrence or at advanced stages [42]. Sadly, cisplatin treatment has some limitations most notably due to its refusal by cancer cells overtime. Also, the fundamental mechanisms of its refusal have yet to be determined [43]. Organic cation transporters (OTCs) are essential in the cellular response to cisplatin [44].

Cisplatin and lung cancer

Lung cancer is found to be the leading cause of cancer mortalities globally. Its mortality rate is 36% per every 100,000 in China [45]. Additionally, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is responsible for almost all cancer-related deaths; particularly in patients in progressive stages III and IV of the disease [46,47]. Cis-diammine-dichloro-platinum (II) or cisplatin is regarded as the most popular anti-neoplastic drug to treat NSCLC [48]. However, cisplatin is also known to induce unfavorable side effects and drug resistance, especially after long-term exposure [48]. Combining cisplatin with other chemotherapeutic drugs such as paclitaxel, gemcitabine, docetaxel, or vinorelbine, represents a basic method for initial treatment of NSCLC [49]. Furthermore, strengthening the awareness of malignant cells to cisplatin in low doses is still an objective for the effectiveness of chemotherapy [50].

Cisplatin and breast cancer

Breast Cancer (BC) is among the most prevalent types of cancer diagnosed in women; with majority of instances happening in women over the age of 60 [51]. Similar to the treatment of other malignancies, cisplatin is also used as the first-line agent for BC treatment [52]. Radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy or any combination of these approaches has been used for BC treatment [51]. Carboplatin, another platinum-based, anti-neoplastic drug, has been used to treat breast cancer; however, cisplatin is still the most useful drug in healing BC [53]. According to the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) the combination of cisplatin combined and doxorubicin has been considered as regular treatment based on Phase III clinical trials data [54]. Nevertheless, the widespread use of cisplatin as an effective anti-neoplastic drug has been limited due to side effects including nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and myelosuppression [5558].

Cisplatin and cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is ranked number two among the most prevalent malignancies and number three as the main cause of mortality in women in developing countries. Globally in 2012, its incidence and mortality cases were of 527, 600 and 265,700 respectively [59]. Cisplatin combined with pelvic-radiotherapy is the basic regimen for patients with increased risk factors and/or receiving surgery at premature stages [60,61]. Concurrent administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel is a common form of chemotherapy for advanced or reoccurring uterine cervical; according to a Phase III clinical trial by the Gynecologic Oncology Group [62]. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) may be a biomarker in cervical cancer because of its high expression ranging between 60–90%; and in some studies, has even been affiliated with lack of prognosis [63]. Moreover, such EGFR levels were high in cisplatin refusal malignancies versus cancers sensitive to cisplatin; mainly because cisplatin is prone to activating tyrosine phosphorylation in the EGFR, which is responsible for fixing DNA damage upon treatment with cisplatin [64,65].

Cisplatin and gastric cancer

Gastric/stomach cancer (GC) is ranked number four among the most familiar types of cancer; with a yearly mortality of 738,000 cases worldwide [66]. Consequently, majority of patients with GC are not ascertained of their disease until it has metastasized due to inadequate capabilities of early detection [67]. Although chemotherapy is the standardized treatment for GC; one disadvantage is its multi-drug resistance (MDR) to several anti-neoplastic agents after being administered one chemotherapy drug [68]. Platinum-based drug cisplatin is known to treat GC and is popular at halting the development of malignant cells in humans [69]. Furthermore, analyzing cisplatin modes of action has pioneered the expansion of other combinations of chemotherapy drugs to attack an assortment of stable tumors resistant to cisplatin [70].

Cisplatin and prostate cancer

Malignant tumor initiating in the male prostate or prostate cancer (PC) is considered to be the second common cancer in the world, and is responsible for 10% of all malignancies in men [71,72]. Cisplatin chemotherapy is first-line of treatment in conjunction with carboplatin and oxaliplatin because these platinum-based compounds interact with DNA to form DNA adducts in malignant cells, and induce programmed cell death or apoptosis [7375]. In addition, refusal of cisplatin in PC3 cell lines is assumed to be due to the mutation and/or the nonoperation of p53 gene [76].

Cisplatin and neuroblastoma

Cancer occurring in the sympathetic nervous system in infants and children is known as neuroblastoma [77]. Chemotherapeutic drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin, vincristine, and etoposide are the primary drugs for chemotherapy of neuroblastoma. Reoccurrence of the disease along with drug refusal malignant cells are an interference of the advancement of curing patients with neuroblastoma [78]. It is presumed that resistance stems from epigenetic and several genetic modifications resulting in protein expression and abnormal RNA [79].

Cisplatin and multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM), or cancer initiated in plasma cells found in bone marrow is still an incurable disease and despite the achievement of initial therapy; and so many patients with MM experience reoccurrence of the disease [80]. Research has pointed out that the general survival rate of MM patients is about nine months; with five months without reoccurrence [81]. Presently there is no basic form of treatment for multiple myeloma patients resistant to chemotherapeutic agents who do not meet the criteria for involvement of clinical trials [82]. However, the consolidation of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin has shown effectiveness in treating MM patients [83].

Cisplatin and melanoma

Malignant tumors in the cutaneous melanoma is the most destructive type of skin cancer. However, once the disease has metastasized toward the localized lymph nodes endurance rate is 29% and is further reduced to only 7% when the disease has spread towards major organs [84]. Anti-tumor agent cisplatin has been known to treat melanoma for the past 30 years; exerting its toxic effects by forming DNA adducts and damaging the DNA, leading to programmed cell death. On the contrary, the platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug is comparably resistant to melanoma, despite its efficacy towards other malignancies [85]. Some assumptions that may explain its chemo-refusal to cisplatin are errors in cellular-programmed death signaling, highly monitoring of DNA repair, and the interference of amassing agents from drug pumps [86].

Cisplatin and mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma from tumor cells forming in the lining of the chest and abdomen is a rare, yet intrusive, type of cancer causing less than 1% of cancer mortality worldwide [87]. Cisplatin administered simultaneously with other chemotherapy drugs, or used as a single agent, is a standard treatment for malignant mesothelioma; even though its usefulness is narrow due to resistance [88]. Early detection of mesothelioma is poor; and on average patients survive only 1 year after diagnosis [89]. Radiotherapy and surgery are other procedures used in the treatment of mesothelioma; however, cisplatin chemotherapy is still highly favored [90]. Other possible combinations such as piroxicam and cisplatin have illustrated upgraded anti-tumor effects; heightening chances for survival in both in vitro and laboratory animal studies [91]. Such combination has also been reported to modulate cell-cycle progression, inducing programmed cell death or apoptosis [92]. Despite the emerging success of cisplatin and piroxicam, cisplatin use in mesothelioma treatment remains limited due to its toxicity.

Cisplatin and leukemia

Leukemia or cancer in the blood is a well-known malignancy affecting a large number of people worldwide. Its incidence and mortality rates in children have been estimated to be 26% and 20%, respectively [93]. In the beginning stages, cellular distinction and function are widely managed; allowing productive therapy and death is minimal. However, without adequate treatment, the disease vastly progresses to lethal acute myeloid leukemia, or blastic phase; regrettably at this phase, the progressed disease is nearly incurable with modern drug therapy [94]. Since the approval of cisplatin by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1978; it has been an increasingly used anti-neoplastic agent in nearly 70% of patients as a component of treatment [95,96]. Although the implementation of platinum-based compounds has led to successful chemotherapy, its helpfulness in treating several malignancies has been diminished due to drug refusal and toxicity [97].

Cisplatin and bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is ranked the highest in incidence rates of all cancers of the urinary system, in China [98]. Surgery and chemotherapy are the first-lines of treatment for bladder cancer. Cisplatin is known to be largely used in bladder cancer, showing potent anti-neoplastic effects [99]. However, some bladder cancer patients experience low sensitivity to cisplatin leading to drug resistance; altering its overall effectiveness of chemotherapy [100,101].

Cisplatin and Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is a result of malignant tumors that initiate in the lymphatic system. Although its pathology is unfamiliar, the molecular and immunological complexity of HL suggests that these tumors arise from B-cells [102]. Minimum differentiation among children and adults in clinical and histological limitations has been explained [103]. Almost all HL patients experience successful treatment results with initial therapy, 30%−40% of HL patients in progressive stage are unsuccessful at full remission or experience reoccurrence [104,105]. In the United Kingdom suitable treatment for most HL patients upon relapse, include restorative chemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem-cell transplantation. Restorative regimens consist of high dose cisplatin and cytarabine, etoposide, and methyl-prednisolone; with response rates ranging between 60%−85% [106,107]. Similarly, to HL, the basic treatment for patients with non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) is high administration chemotherapy combined with autologous stem-cell transplant for initial treatment and for patients who experience reoccurrence of NHL [108].

Conclusion

Cisplatin is a potent chemotherapeutic drug that has shown efficacy for the treatment of many malignancies including head and neck, ovarian, sarcomas, lymphoma, and prostate cancer. Once inside the cell, it exerts its cytotoxic effect by losing one chloride ligand, and forming DNA adducts resulting in cisplatin-induced DNA lesions. In response to this effect, several signaling transduction pathways are activated such as the mitogen-activation protein kinase pathways, DNA repair genes (Gadd45), p53 regulatory protein (mdm2), and several proteins that modulate apoptosis (bax, bcl-x1, bcl-2). Although treatment has been shown to be effective, many patients experience relapse due to drug resistance. As a result, other platinum compounds have since been used and have shown some levels of effectiveness. Cisplatin has also been administered in combination therapy as a method to reduce adverse side effects and resistance. Further research on cisplatin’s cytotoxic molecular mechanisms and synergistic effects with other cancer drugs is needed for the development of more effective anti-tumor drug treatment regimens.

Acknowledgments

The research described in this publication was made possible by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. G12MD007581) through the RCMI Center for Environmental Health at Jackson State University.

References

  • 1.Rosenberg B (1973) Platinum coordination complexes in cancer chemotherapy. Naturwissenschaften 60: 399–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siddik ZH (2003) Cisplatin: Mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance. Oncogene 22: 7265–7279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosenberg B, VanCamp L, Trosko JE, Mansour VH (1969) Platinum compounds: A new class of potent antitumour agents. Nature 222 : 385–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kelland L (2007) The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 7: 573–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shen DW, Pouliot LM, Hall MD, Gottesman MM (2012) Cisplatin resistance: A cellular self-defense mechanism resulting from multiple epigenetic and genetic changes. Pharmacol Rev 64: 706–721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Colton SL, Xu XS, Wang YA, Wang G (2007) The involvement of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated protein activation in nucleotide excision repair-facilitated cell survival with cisplatin treatment. J Biol Chem 281: 27117–27125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin X, Howell SB (2006) DNA mismatch repair and p53 function are major determinants of the rate of development of cisplatin resistance. Mol Cancer Ther 5: 1239–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shimodaira H, Yoshioka-Yamashita A, Kolodner RD, Wang JY (2003) Interaction of mismatch repair protein PMS2 and the p53-related transcription factor p73 in apoptosis response to cisplatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 2420–2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin X, Ramamurthi K, Mishima M, Kondo A, Christen RD, et al. (2001) p53 modulates the effect of loss of DNA mismatch repair on the sensitivity of human colon cancer cells to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of cisplatin. Cancer Res 61: 1508–1516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Branch P, Masson M, Aquilina G, Bignami M, Karran P (2000) Spontaneous development of drug resistance: Mismatch repair and p53 defects in resistance to cisplatin in human tumor cells. Oncogene 19: 3138–3145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.De Laurenzi V, Melino G (2000) Evolution of functions within the p53/p63/p73 family. Ann N Y Acad Sci 926: 90–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Persons DL, Yazlovitskaya EM, Pelling JC (2000) Effect of extracellular signal-regulated kinase on p53 accumulation in response to cisplatin. J Biol Chem 275: 35778–35785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kutuk O, Arisan ED, Tezil T, Shoshan MC, Basaga H (2009) Cisplatin overcomes Bcl-2-mediated resistance to apoptosis via preferential engagement of Bak: Critical role of Noxa-mediated lipid peroxidation. Carcinogenesis 30: 1517–1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Basu A, Krishnamurthy S (2010) Cellular responses to Cisplatin-induced DNA damage. J Nucleic Acids 2010: 201367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kerr JF, Winterford CM, Harmon BV (1994) Apoptosis. Its significance in cancer and cancer therapy. Cancer 73: 2013–2026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jayson GC, Kohn EC, Kitchener HC, Ledermann JA (2014) Ovarian cancer. Lancet 384: 1376–1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tew WP, Fleming GF (2015) Treatment of ovarian cancer in the older woman. Gynecol Oncol 136: 136–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu J, Matulonis UA (2014) New strategies in ovarian cancer: Translating the molecular complexity of ovarian cancer into treatment advances. Clin Cancer Res 20: 5150–5156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ai Z, Lu Y, Qiu S, Fan Z (2016) Overcoming cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer cells by targeting H1F-1-regualated cancer metabolism. Cancer Lett 373: 36–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bokemeyer C, Berger CC, Kuczyk MA, Schmoll HJ (1996) Evaluation of long-term toxicity after chemotherapy for testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 14: 2923–2932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pink RC, Samuel P, Massa D, Caley DP, Brooks SA, et al. (2015) The passenger strand, miR-21–3p, plays a role in mediating cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Gynecol Oncol 137: 143–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Einhorn LH (2002) Curing metastatic testicular cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 4592–4595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koster R, Van Vugt MA, Timmer-Bosscha H, Gietema JA, de Jong S (2013) Unravelling mechanisms of cisplatin sensitivity and resistance in testicular cancer. Expert Rev Mol Med 15: e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Boer H, Proost JH, Nuver J, Bunskoek S, Gietema JQ, et al. (2015) Long-term exposure to circulating platinum is associated with late effects of treatment in testicular cancer survivors. Ann Oncol 26: 2305–2310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kondagunta GV, Sheinfeld J, Mazumdar M, Mariani TV, Bajorin D, et al. (2004) Relapse-free and overall survival in patients with pathologic stage II nonseminomatous germ cell cancer treated with etoposide and cisplatin adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22: 464–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Einhorn LH (2007) Role of the urologist in metastatic testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 1024–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Horwich A, Shipley J, Huddart R (2006) Testicular germ-cell cancer. Lancet 367: 754–765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Roh JL, Park JY, Kim EH, Jang HJ (2016) Targeting acid ceramidase sensitises head and neck cancer to cisplatin. Eur J Cancer 52: 163–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Petrelli F, Coinu A, Riboldi V, Borgonovo K, Ghilardi M, et al. (2014) Concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy or cetuximab with radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Oral Oncol 50: 1041–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Adelstein DJ, Li Y, Adams GL, Wagner H Jr, Kish JA, et al. (2003) An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 21: 92–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Beckmann GK, Hoppe F, Pfreundner L, Flentje MP (2005) Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in combination with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck 27: 36–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Espeli V, Zucca E, Ghielmini M, Giannini O, Salatino A, et al. (2012) Weekly and 3-weekly cisplatin concurrent with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Oral Oncol 48: 266–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Driessen CM, Janssens GO, van der Graaf WT, Takes RP, Merkx TA, et al. (2016) Toxicity and efficacy of accelerated radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck carcinoma. Head Neck 38: E559–E565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Posner MR, Hershock DM, Blajman CR, Mickiewicz E, Winquist E, et al. (2007) Cisplatin and fluorouracil alone or with docetaxel in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 357: 1705–1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vermorken JB, Remenar E, Van Herpen C, Gorlia T, Mesia R, et al. (2007) Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel in unresectable head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 357: 1695–1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Toshimitsu H, Hashimoto K, Tangoku A, Iizuka N, Yamamoto K, et al. (2004) Molecular signature linked to acquired resistance to cisplatin in esophageal cancer cells. Cancer Lett 211: 69–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Herszenyi L, Tulassay Z (2010) Epidemiology of gastrointestinal and liver tumors. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 14: 249–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang Y (2013) Epidemiology of esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 19: 5598–5606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.D’Journo XB, Thomas PA (2014) Current management of esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis 6: S253–S264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yu L, Chen M, Li Z, Wen J, Fu J, et al. (2011) Celecoxib antagonizes the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells by reducing intracellular cisplatin accumulation. Mol Pharmacol 79: 608–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lin R, Li X, Li J, Zhang L, Xu F, et al. (2013) Long-term cisplatin exposure promotes methylation of the OCT1 gene in human esophageal cancer cells. Dig Dis Sci 58: 694–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.More SS, Li S, Yee SW, Chen L, Xu Z, et al. (2010) Organic cation transporters modulate the uptake and cytotoxicity of picoplatin, a third-generation platinum analogue. Mol Cancer Ther 9: 1058–1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schaeffeler E, Hellerbrand C, Nies AT, Winter S, Kruck S, et al. (2011) DNA methylation is associated with downregulation of the organic cation transporter OCT1 (SLC22A1) in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Genome Med 3: 82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kataoka K, Tsushima T, Mizusawa J, Hironaka S, Tsubosa Y, et al. (2015) A randomized controlled phase III trial comparing 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (2-weekly DCF) with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer: Rationale, design and methods of Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1314 (MIRACLE study). Jpn J Clin Oncol 45: 494–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, et al. (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136: E359–E386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li J, Wang J, Hao X, Zhang X, Shi Y (2012) Efficacy of pemetrexed as second-line therapy or beyond in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 15: 179–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60: 277–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kostova I (2006) Platinum complexes as anticancer agents. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 1: 1–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Scagliotti GV (2005) Pemetrexed: A new cytotoxic agent in the development for first-line non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 50: S18–S19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li Q, Yang Z, Chen M, Liu Y (2016) Downregulation of microRNA-196a enhances the sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin treatment. Int J Mol Med 37: 1067–1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A (2011) Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 408–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Obel JC, Friberg G, Fleming GF (2006) Chemotherapy in endometrial cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 4: 459–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Buzdar AU (2009) Role of biologic therapy and chemotherapy in hormone receptor-and HER2-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol 20: 993–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cohen SM, Mukerji R, Cai S, Damjanov I, Forrest ML, et al. (2011) Subcutaneous delivery of nanoconjugated doxorubicin and cisplatin for locally advanced breast cancer demonstrates improved efficacy and decreased toxicity at lower doses than standard systemic combination therapy in vivo. Am J Surg 202: 646–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hartmann JT, Fels LM, Knop S, Stolte H, Kanz L, et al. (2000) A randomized trial comparing the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin/ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy with or without amifostine in patients with solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 18: 281–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hartmann JT, Lipp HP (2003) Toxicity of platinum compounds. Expert Opin Pharmacother 4: 889–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Iraz M, Ozerol E, Gulec M, Tasdemir S, Idiz N, et al. (2006) Protective effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) administration on cisplatin-induced oxidative damage to liver in rat. Cell Biochem Funct 24: 357–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nazıroǧlu M, Karaoğlu A, Aksoy AO (2004) Selenium and high dose vitamin E administration protects cisplatin-induced oxidative damage to renal, liver and lens tissues in rats. Toxicology 195: 221–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65: 87–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen CC, Lin JC, Jan JS, Ho SC, Wang L (2011) Definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 122: 9–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mabuchi S, Isohashi F, Yokoi T, Takemura M, Yoshino K, et al. (2016) A phase II study of postoperative concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel combined with intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in surgically treated cervical cancer patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 141: 240–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS, Cohn DE, Ramondetta LM, et al. (2009) Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 27: 4649–4655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Soonthornthum T, Arias-Pulido H, Joste N, Lomo L, Muller C, et al. (2011) Epidermal growth factor receptor as a biomarker for cervical cancer. Ann Oncol 22: 2166–2178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Li D, Wu QJ, Bi FF, Chen SL, Zhou YM, et al. (2016) Effect of the BRCA1-SIRT1-EGFR axis on cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer. Am J Transl Res 8: 1601–1608. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liccardi G, Hartley JA, Hochhauser D (2011) EGFR nuclear translocation modulates DNA repair following cisplatin and ionizing radiation treatment. Cancer Res 71: 1103–1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, et al. (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127: 2893–2917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.An Y, Zhang Z, Shang Y, Jiang X, Dong J, et al. (2015) miR-23b-3p regulates the chemoresistance of gastric cancer cells by targeting ATG12 and HMGB2. Cell Death Dis 6: e1766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Szakács G, Paterson JK, Ludwig JA, Booth-Genthe C, Gottesman MM (2006) Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5: 219–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jansen BA, Brouwer J, Reedijk J (2002) Glutathione induces cellular resistance against cationic dinuclear platinum anticancer drugs. J Inorg Biochem 89: 197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Weir NM, Selvendiran K, Kutala VK, Tong L, Vishwanath S, et al. (2007) Curcumin induces G2/M arrest and apoptosis in cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cells by modulating Akt and p38 MAPK. Cancer Biol Ther 6: 178–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wallner LP, Jacobsen SJ (2013) Prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer mortality: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 45: 318–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Thomsen FB, Brasso K, Klotz LH, Røder MA, Berg KD, et al. (2014) Active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer-A systematic review. J Surg Oncol 109: 830–835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dhar S, Kolishetti N, Lippard SJ, Farokhzad OC (2011) Targeted delivery of a cisplatin prodrug for safer and more effective prostate cancer therapy in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 1850–1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Menen R, Zhao M, Zhang L, Hassanein MK, Bobek V, et al. (2012) Comparative chemosensitivity of circulating human prostate cancer cells and primary cancer cells. Anticancer Res 32: 2881–2884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhu W, Li Y, Gao L (2015) Cisplatin in combination with programmed cell death protein 5 increases antitumor activity in prostate cancer cells by promoting apoptosis. Mol Med Rep 11: 4561–4566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shiota M, Izumi H, Tanimoto A, Takahashi M, Miyamoto N, et al. (2009) Programmed cell death protein 4 down-regulates Y-box binding protein-1 expression via a direct interaction with Twist1 to suppress cancer cell growth. Cancer Res 69: 3148–3156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jansen AP, Camalier CE, Stark C, Colburn NH (2004) Characterization of programmed cell death 4 in multiple human cancers reveals a novel enhancer of drug sensitivity. Mol Cancer Ther 3: 103–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Piskareva O, Harvey H, Nolan J, Conlon R, Alcock L, et al. (2015) The development of cisplatin resistance in neuroblastoma is accompanied by epithelial to mesenchymal transition in vitro. Cancer Lett 364: 142–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Jakubowiak A (2012) Management strategies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: current clinical perspectives. Semin Hematol 49: S16–S32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, Morgan G, Richardson PG, et al. (2012) Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: A multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia 26: 149–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bird JM, Owen RG, D’Sa S, Snowden JA, Pratt G, et al. (2011) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2011. Br J Haematol 154: 32–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lazzarino M, Corso A, Barbarano L, Alessandrino EP, Cairoli R, et al. (2001) DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) is an effective regimen for peripheral blood stem cell collection in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 28: 835–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV, Jouary T, Gutzmer R, et al. (2012) Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: A multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 380: 358–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ichihashi N, Kitajima Y (2001) Chemotherapy induces or increases expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein in malignant melanoma cells. Br J Dermatol 144: 745–750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kartalou M, Essigmann JM (2001) Mechanisms of resistance to cisplatin. Mutat Res 478: 23–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Spugnini EP, Bosari S, Citro G, Lorenzon I, Cognetti F, et al. (2006) Human malignant mesothelioma: molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis and progression. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 38: 2000–2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ray M, Kindler HL (2009) Malignant pleural mesothelioma: An update on biomarkers and treatment. Chest 136: 888–896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Crispi S, Cardillo I, Spugnini EP, Citro G, Menegozzo S, et al. (2010) Biological agents involved in malignant mesothelioma: Relevance as biomarkers or therapeutic targets. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 10: 19–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pistolesi M, Rusthoven J (2004) Malignant pleural mesothelioma: Update, current management, and newer therapeutic strategies. Chest 126: 1318–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Spugnini EP, Cardillo I, Verdina A, Crispi S, Saviozzi S, et al. (2006) Piroxicam and cisplatin in a mouse model of peritoneal mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res 12: 6133–6143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Baldi A, Piccolo MT, Boccellino MR, Donizetti A, Cardillo I, et al. (2011) Apoptosis induced by piroxicam plus cisplatin combined treatment is triggered by p21 in mesothelioma. PloS one 6: e23569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pereira Fde C, de Lima AP, Vilanova-Costa CA, Pires WC, Ribeiro Ade S, et al. (2014) Cytotoxic effects of the compound cis-tetraammine (oxalato) ruthenium (III) dithionate on K-562 human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Springerplus 3: 301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Deininger MW (2008) Chronic myeloid leukemia: An historical perspective. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2008: 418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Dorcier A, Ang WH, Bolano S, Gonsalvi L, Juillerat-Jeannerat L, et al. (2006) In vitro evaluation of rhodium and osmium RAPTA analogues: the case for organometallic anticancer drugs not based on ruthenium. Organometallics 25: 4090–4096. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Stordal B, Pavlakis N, Davey R (2007) A systematic review of platinum and taxane resistance from bench to clinic: an inverse relationship. Cancer Treat Rev 33: 688–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Jirsova K, Mandys V, Gispen WH, Bär PR (2006) Cisplatin-induced apoptosis in cultures of human Schwann cells. Neurosci Lett 392: 22–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Xu W, Wang F, Ying L, Wang HH (2014) Association between glutathione S-transferase M1 null variant and risk of bladder cancer in Chinese Han population. Tumour Biol 35: 773–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Costantini C, Millard F (2011) Update on chemotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. ScientificWorldJournal 11: 1981–1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Shirato A, Kikugawa T, Miura N, Tanji N, Takemori N, et al. (2014) Cisplatin resistance by induction of aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C2 in human bladder cancer cells. Oncol Lett 7: 674–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Michels J, Brenner C, Szabadkai G, et al. (2014) Systems biology of cisplatin resistance: past, present and future. Cell Death Dis 5: e1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Drexler HG, Minowada J (1992) Hodgkin’s disease derived cell lines: A review. Hum Cell 5: 42–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bazzeh F, Rihani R, Howard S, Sultan I (2010) Comparing adult and pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program, 1988–2005: An analysis of 21734 cases. Leuk Lymphoma 51: 2198–2207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, Pearcey RG, Bezjak A, et al. (2005) Randomized comparison of ABVD chemotherapy with a strategy that includes radiation therapy in patients with limited-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Onco 23: 4634–4642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Fermé C, Eghbali H, Meerwaldt JH, Rieux C, Bosq J, et al. (2007) Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in early-stage Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 357: 1916–1927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Aparicio J, Segura A, Garcerá S, Oltra A, Santaballa A, et al. (1999) ESHAP is an active regimen for relapsing Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Oncol 10: 593–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Brice P (2008) Managing relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 141: 3–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somers R, Van der Lelie H, et al. (1995) Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 333: 1540–1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES