TABLE.

Reported agreement in visual inspection of sMRI data on QC studies.

			Reported visual inspection issue related to
Study	QC agreement details		MRI Aquisition	Head motion	Brain extraction	Tissue segmentation	Brain registration
Backhausen et al., 2016	Nb. Images	88	Image sharpness, ringing. Contrast to noise ratio (subcortical structures and gray/white matter) and susceptibility artifacts	Ghosting or blurring	N.R	N.R	N.R
	Nb. Raters	2
	Rating scale	Include/Exclude
	QC Manual	Supplementary Material
	Agreement	ICC = 0.93
Esteban et al., 2017	Nb. Images	100	signal-to-noise ratio. Image contrast and Ringing	Head motion artifacts	Gray/white matter and the pial delineation	Gray–white matter segmentation	N.R
	Nb Raters	2
	Rating scale	Exclude/Doubtful/Accept
	QC Manual	N.R
	Agreement	Cohen’s Kappa = 0 39
Rosen et al., 2018	Nb. Images	Phasel = l00, Phase2 = 100	N.R	N.R	N.R	N.R	N.R
	Nb. Raters	Phase1 = 2, Phase2 = 3
	Rating scale	0/1/2
	QC Manual	N.R
	Agreement	Phasel = 100%, Phase2 = 85%
Fonov et al., 2018 (preprint)	Nb. Images	9693 (1000 rated twice)	Effect of noise and image intensity non-uniformity	N.R	N.R	N.R	Incorrect estimates of, translation, scaling in all directions and rotation.
	Nb. Raters	1
	Rating scale	Accept/Fail
	QC Manual	Dadar et al., 2018 paper
	Agreement	intra-rater Dice similarity = 0.96
Klapwijk et al., 2019	Nb. Images	80	N.R	Ringing	Division between gray/white matter and pial surface	Gray–white matter segmentation	N.R
	Nb. Raters	5
	Rating scale	Excellent/Good/Doubtful/Failed
	QC Manual	Supplementary Material
	Agreement	Reliability = 0.53

QC studies since 2010 that uses sMRI and reported their inter/intra-raters agreement (Pizarro et al., 2016; Esteban et al., 2017; Dadar et al., 2018; Fonov et al., 2018; Rosen et al., 2018; Klapwijk et al., 2019). N.R: Not reported.