Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;2020(3):CD008962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008962.pub2

Comparison 5. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) versus supervised exercises.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mean pain (9‐point Likert, 9 is most pain) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 6 weeks 1 90 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.30 [‐0.53, 1.13]
1.2 3 months 1 102 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [‐0.36, 1.16]
1.3 6 months 1 100 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [‐0.56, 0.96]
1.4 12 months 1 97 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.5 [‐0.20, 1.20]
2 Mean function (SPADI 0–100, 100 is best) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 6 weeks 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 3 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 6 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.4 12 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Proportion of participants who withdrew due to adverse events 1 104 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.32, 27.91]
4 Proportion of participants who experienced adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Active range of abduction 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.1 3 months 1 104 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.95 [‐10.50, 6.60]
5.2 6 months 1 104 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐11.82 [‐25.37, 1.73]