Zocco 2003.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | RCT (abstract only) Setting: not stated Study period: not stated |
|
| Participants |
Inclusion: inactive UC and quiescent Crohn's disease* Exclusion: not stated Age (mean): 32 years Sex (M/F): 20/16 Site of disease: not stated Use of medication: not stated Length of time remission at study entry: not stated Number randomised (n = 36): 12 (probiotic)/10 (mesalazine)/14 (probiotic + mesalazine) Number assessed: 12 (probiotic)/10 (mesalazine)/14 (probiotic + mesalazine) Postrandomisation exclusion: none |
|
| Interventions |
|
|
| Outcomes |
Duration of follow‐up: 12 months
|
|
| Notes |
Funding source: not stated Declaration of interest: not reported Data from participants with CD were discarded due to the limited scope of the review. |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Participants were reportedly randomised, however, no further details were available |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants appear to have been accounted for |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The study was published as an abstract. Insufficient information to make a judgement |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | The study was published as an abstract. Insufficient information to make a judgement |