Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;2020(3):CD007443. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007443.pub3

Fan 2019.

Methods RCT, single centre
Setting: The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Study duration: January 2015 to June 2016
Participants 40 with IBD randomised (19 control group, 21 observation group)
UC total: 31, CD total: 9; UC control 15, CD IV 4; CD control 4, CD IV 5
Inclusion: confirmed IBD diagnosis with mild to moderate symptoms as per the current standards in China; no previous probiotic treatment; no allergy to drugs used in the present study; cognisance of the purpose of the present study and willingness to sign an informed consent
Exclusion: severe heart, liver, kidney and other systemic diseases; pregnancy or lactation; unresponsive to medical treatment and with complications; immune system disorders
Sex (M/F): 10/9 control group; 10/11 observation group
Age (mean +/‐ SD): 39.97 +/‐ 8.68 control group; 42.56 +/‐ 7.58 observation group
Site of disease: not specified
Use of medication: not specified
Length of time remission at study entry: not specified
Number randomised: 40
Number assessed: not specified
Postrandomisation exclusion: not specified
Follow‐up: 40 days
Interventions IV: pentasa (mesalazine extended action tablet) as in the control regimen + probiotics (2 tablets Bifico once and three times/day + "a largely liquid‐based high nutrition diet"
Control: 1 to 2 pentasa tablets once and three times/day and a maintenance dose of 1 tablet once and three times/day
Outcomes
  • Microflora composition

  • Biochemical indices

  • Inflammatory markers

  • Activity scores

Notes Mixed: contacted author for UC data
This work was supported by the Fujian Province Natural Science Fund Project
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest