Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;2020(3):CD001838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub6

Karlstrom 1993.

Methods Trial design: parallel
 Single centre, Sweden
Participants Couples with unexplained subfertility and minimal or mild endometriosis
N randomised: not clear; N analysed: 79
 Age: 32 years (range 21 years to 38 years)
 Duration of subfertility: 5 years (range 2 years to 14 years)
 Basic fertility work‐up normal, semen normal according to WHO 1987
 Previous treatment: no
Interventions Comparison: IUI + OH versus TI + OH (vs DIPI + OH vs IUI and DIPI + OH)
 Stimulation method 1: 150 IU hMG starting dose, til 1 follicle of at least 17 mm was present or the detection of a LH surge in serum or urine
 Monitoring: USS and serum E2
 Ovulation: 10,000 IU hCG
 Timing: IUI 36 hr to 41 hr after hCG or 24 hr after detection of LH surge. TI the 2 following nights after hCG injection
Stimulation method 2: 100 mg CC/day for 5 days
Monitoring + ovulation: urinary LH timed
 Timing: IUI 20 hr to 28 hr after LH surge, TI day of LH surge and day after
Cycles were cancelled according to serum E2 rise
Duration of treatment: 1 cycle max
Outcomes PR per cycle
 Ectopic PR
 Pregnancy not further defined
Notes ITT analysis: not possible
 When ovulation occurred during the weekend, participants were transferred to TI group
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding was not possible because of the nature of the interventions
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding was not possible because of the nature of the interventions and non‐blinding was not likely to affect the outcomes of interest
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 4 withdrawals in clomiphene group due to absent LH surge, 5 withdrawals in hMG group due to absent LH surge, fast oestrogen rise or personal reasons
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Live birth data were not reported
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information was reported on demographic characteristics to make a conclusive judgement