Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;2020(3):CD005004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005004.pub3

7. Methodological quality of experimental studies.

Study Random sequence generation Allocationconcealment Blinding of participants and personnel Blinding of outcome assessment Incomplete outcome data Selective reporting Other bias
Bettuzzi 2006 Low risk Unclear risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk: PSA levels
Unclear risk: prostate cancer and LUTS
Low risk: prostate cancer and PSA levels
Unclear risk: LUTS
Unclear risk Low risk
Dostal 2015 Low risk Low risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk Unclear risk
Dryden 2013 Low risk Low risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk High risk
Garcia 2014 Low risk Low risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk Low risk
Garland 2006 Low risk Unclear risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) High risk Low risk Unclear risk
Kumar 2015 Low risk Low risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk: prostate cancer and PSA levels
Unclear risk: LUTS
Low risk Unclear risk
Lane 2018 Low risk Low risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Unclear risk (all outcomes) High risk Unclear risk
Micali 2017 Low risk Unclear risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Unclear risk High risk
Roshdy 2013 Low risk Low risk Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Unclear risk (all outcomes) Low risk Unclear risk
Sinicrope 2017 Low risk Unclear risk Low risk (al outcomes) Unclear risk (all outcomes) Low risk (all outcomes) Low risk Low risk
Tsao 2009 Low risk Low risk Low risk (al outcomes) Low risk: other outcomes
Unclear risk: oral lesions
Unclear risk (all outcomes) Unclear risk Low risk
LUTS: lower urinary tract symptoms; PSA: prostate‐specific antigens