Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;2020(3):CD012681. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012681.pub2

Sundberg 2013.

Methods Study design: cross‐sectional study (questionnaire survey)
Instrument used to assess fatigue: SF‐36 Vitality subscale
Validated questionnaire: yes
Cut‐off score or criterion for severe fatigue: score ≤ 50
Time points at which outcome data were collected: NA, cross‐sectional study
Inclusion criteria: SCT survivor group: treatment in the paediatric SCT programme between October 1985 and June 1999, young adults > 18 years old, no history of chronic GVHD and immunosuppressive therapy
Non‐SCT group: ALL diagnosis, diagnosed at age < 18 years, during period 1985 ‐ 1999, at least 18 years of age at time of the study
Exclusion criteria: nm
Participants Sample characteristics:
N of participants original cohort: 415; N of participants described study group: 70; N of participants study group of interest: 70; N of participants fatigue assessed: 64
Participant characteristics:
Tumour type: SCT group: ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma n = 18, non‐SCT group: ALL n = 52
Tumour stage: nm
Age at diagnosis: SCT group: median 5 years (range 1 ‐ 15), non‐SCT group: median 6.5 (range 0 ‐ 16)
Time since end of therapy: SCT group: median 18 years (range 10 ‐ 22), non‐SCT group: median 14 years (range 5 ‐ 18)
Age at assessment: SCT group: median 27 years (range 18 ‐ 37), non‐SCT group: median 22 years (range 19 ‐ 33)
F/M: SCT group: 8/10, non‐SCT group: 27/25
BMI: nm
Race/ethnicity: nm
Marital status: SCT group: married/partnered n = 6, non‐SCT group: married/partnered n = 13
Highest completed education level: SCT group: junior compulsory n = 3, senior high school n = 9, postgraduate/university n = 6
 non‐SCT group: junior compulsory n = 16, senior high school n = 30, postgraduate/university n = 6
Employment: SCT group: student n = 5, working n = 9, unemployed n = 2, sick leave n = 2
 non‐SCT group: student n = 22, working n = 25, unemployed n = 4, sick leave n = 1
Physical activity level: SF‐36 physical functioning, SCT group: mean 90.0 (SD 13.1), non‐SCT group mean 95.3 (SD 11.2)
Sleeping problems: nm
Psychosocial problems: nm
 Comorbidities/late effects: nm
Genetic factors/mutations: nm
Interventions N of participants chemotherapy: nm
N of participants radiotherapy: nm
N of participants surgery: nm
N of participants cranial irradiation: SCT group 7, non‐SCT group 21
N of participants SCT: SCT group 18
Outcomes Severe fatigue:
N of participants with severe fatigue: 23/64 (35.94%)
Risk and associated factors:
no analysis performed with fatigue as outcome
Notes Funding sources: Swedish Childrens’s Cancer Foundation
Declaration of interest: Nothing to declare
The following data were obtained from the study author: N of participants with severe fatigue
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Representative study group (selection bias) High risk The described study group consisted of < 90% of the original cohort
Adequate follow‐up assessment (attrition bias) Low risk Outcome was assessed for 65% ‐ 95% of the study group of interest
Blinded outcome assessor (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Outcome assessors were not blinded to the investigated determinant
Well‐defined study group (reporting bias) High risk Type of cancer is mentioned and information on cancer treatment is limited to cranial irradiation and SCT. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are described
Well‐defined follow‐up (reporting bias) Low risk Length of follow‐up is mentioned
Well‐defined outcome severe fatigue (reporting bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The authors reported which instrument they used to assess fatigue and definition of severe fatigue is based on data query