Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 20;2020:9634328. doi: 10.1155/2020/9634328

Table 2.

Awareness rate of HIV, VCT service, and stigma among participants in both citiesa.

Variable Liuzhou City (n = 575) Fuyang City (n = 403) χ 2 P
Awareness of HIV knowledge 0.036 0.848
 Yes 80.0 (460/575) 80.9 (326/403)
 No 20.0 (115/575) 19.1 (79/403)
Ever heard of VCT service 1.732 0.188
 Yes 53.6 (308/575) 57.8 (233/403)
 No 46.4 (267/575) 42.2 (170/403)
Ever took part in VCT program 0.479 0.489
 Yes 52.3 (301/575) 54.6 (220/403)
 No 47.7 (274/575) 45.4 (183/403)
Took VCT program among participants who heard of VCT 0.041 0.840
 Yes 65.3 (201/308) 66.1 (154/233)
 No 34.7 (107/308) 33.9 (79/233)
Believed that the personal information was confidential among participants who heard of VCT 23.316 <0.001
 Yes 69.8 (215/308) 54.8 (115/233)
 No 30.2 (93/308) 45.2 (118/233)
Known where to get VCT service among participants who heard of VCT 20.141 <0.001
 Yes 70.8 (218/308) 51.9 (121/233)
 No 29.2 (90/308) 48.1 (112/233)
Score ≥ 1 for the six questions about stigma 51.737 <0.001
 Yes 56.2 (323/575) 78.4 (316/403)
 No 43.8 (252/575) 21.6 (87/403)

aValues are given as percentage (numerator/denominator) unless indicated otherwise.