Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 6;20:204. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4931-1

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the participants according to residence

Groups
Total Villages Small town Large town
(n = 394) (n = 77) (n = 73) (n = 244)
N (%) 95% CI N (%) N (%) N (%) P value1
Age (median = 34) 0.95
  < 26 98 (25) 21–29 17 (22) 19 (26) 62 (25)
 26–34 105 (27) 22–31 24 (31) 20 (27) 61 (25)
 35–45 100 (25) 21–30 19 (25) 18 (25) 63 (26)
  > 45 91 (23) 19–28 17 (22) 16 (22) 58 (24)
Occupation < 0.0001
 Housewife 203 (51.5) 47–56 63 (82) 41 (56) 99 (40.5)
 Self employed2 138 (35) 30–40 5 (6) 26 (36) 107 (44)
 Professional or student 53 (13.5) 10–17 9 (12) 6 (8) 11 (15.5)
Number of children (median = 2) < 0.0006
 0 41 (10) 8–14 9 (12) 6 (8) 26 (11)
 1–3 229 (58) 53–63 30 (39) 38 (52) 161 (66)
 4–10 124 (32) 27–32 38 (49) 29 (40) 57 (23)
Current family planning method 0.59
 None 207 (52.5) 48–57 45 (58) 40 (55) 122 (50)
 Hormonal contraception 130 (33) 28–38 27 (35) 22 (30) 81 (33)
 Others3 43 (11) 8–14 3 (4) 10 (14) 30 (12)
 Condom 14 (3.5) 2–6 2 (3) 1 (1) 11 (5)
Cytological inspection PAP 0.2
 Ever 273 (69) 64–73 46 (60) 50 (68) 177 (72)
 Never 121 (31) 27–36 31 (40) 23 (32) 67 (28)

1P value was calculated using χ2 test between residence groups

2Self-employed: Merchant, artisan, cook and farmer

3Others: Intra uterine devise (IUD), tubal ligation and calendar